Estimation of US refinery water consumption and allocation to refinery products

被引:42
作者
Sun, Pingping [1 ]
Elgowainy, Amgad [1 ]
Wang, Michael [1 ]
Han, Jeongwoo [1 ]
Henderson, Robert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst Div, 9700 South Cass Ave,Bldg 362, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[2] Jacobs Consultancy, 525 West Monroe, Chicago, IL 60661 USA
关键词
Refinery; Water; Consumption; Configuration; Allocation; Products; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.089
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Increasing stress on the global water supply necessitates the measurement of water consumption as a sustainability metric to evaluate energy production, including the production of transportation fuels (gasoline, diesel, jet fuel) at petroleum refineries. This study estimated refinery water consumption for petroleum fuels by considering three typical refinery configurations (cracking, light coking, and heavy coking) that process different crude qualities (e.g., American Petroleum Institute Gravity (API) gravity and sulfur content). The results showed that refinery water consumption was 0.34, 0.44, and 0.47 bbl water/bbl crude (L water/L crude) for cracking, light coking, and heavy coking configurations, respectively. The water consumption for a specific refinery product was estimated using an energy allocation approach at the process unit level. The results indicated that gasoline production consumes the largest amount of water, 0.60-0.71 gal water/gal gasoline (0.60-0.71 L water/L gasoline), due to the energy-intensive (and thus water-intensive) processing of gasoline components (mainly sourced from alkylation, reformer, and fluid catalytic cracking units). In contrast, jet fuel production consumes the least water, 0.09 gal water/gal jet fuel, for all three refinery configurations, because it is sourced directly from the crude distillation unit with minimal post-treating. The consumption of diesel is most sensitive to refinery configuration with 0.20, 0.30, and 0.40 gal water/gal diesel (L water/L diesel) for cracking, light coking and heavy coking configurations, respectively. This is mainly because as configuration complexity increases to process heavier and sourer crudes, a sizable burden of hydrogen production from steam methane reforming unit is allocated to diesel fuel production (including diesel sulfur removal). The trend of water consumption associated with these refinery products is consistent with the energy consumption for their production.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 557
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GAO14430
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PROCEEDINGS
[3]  
Buchan M., 2006, AM I CHEM ENG AICHE
[4]   Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at US Refineries [J].
Elgowainy, Amgad ;
Han, Jeongwoo ;
Cai, Hao ;
Wang, Michael ;
Forman, Grant S. ;
DiVita, Vincent B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (13) :7612-7624
[5]   WATER AND ENERGY [J].
GLEICK, PH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 19 :267-299
[6]  
Global Risk, 2013, IN RISK RESP NETW
[7]  
Han J, 2015, 1510 ANLESD
[8]  
LeJr Otts, 1963, 1330 US DEP INT GEOL
[9]  
Mielke E, 2010, 201015 HARV U HARV K
[10]  
Nabzar L, 2011, WATER FUEL PRODUCTIO