A dynamic performance measurement system for supply chain management

被引:10
作者
Nazari-Ghanbarloo, Vahid [1 ]
机构
[1] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Supply chain performance; Dynamic balanced scorecard; System dynamics; Strategy; Big data; Data mining; BIG DATA ANALYTICS; BALANCED SCORECARD; STRATEGY; MODEL; OPPORTUNITIES; METHODOLOGY; INSIGHTS; BUSINESS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-01-2020-0023
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to propose a dynamic model for measurement supply chain performance (SCP) based on a dynamic balanced scorecard (DBSC). Balanced scorecard (BSC) can be defined as a popular performance measurement method that can translate the strategy into a set of performance indicators and manage the status of implementing the various strategies. However, BSC is unable to simulate the complicated environment and the dynamic behavior of performance metrics. Therefore, the author combines BSC with system dynamics (SD) to explore a more efficient tool for measurement SCP. Design/methodology/approach A dynamic causal model is proposed based on the causal hypotheses. The developed DBSC enables managers to evaluate and measure the SCP in a much-balanced way. Using DBSC makes it possible that different SCP metrics to be reviewed and distributed into the four above-mentioned perspectives. It also enables supply chain (SC) managers to evaluate different strategies to improve SCP. Findings investigates two strategies to improve SCP as follows: (1) competitive strategy and (2) harvesting big data and using data mining techniques to determine the customer's expectations and then compares the results of these two strategies based on the four perspectives of DBSC and introduce the best strategy. Finally, harvesting big data and data mining is selected as the best strategy. Originality/value This study proposes a novel strategic management tool for measurement SCP and simulation of the complicated environment and the dynamic behavior of performance metrics. The proposed DBSC model enables managers to compare different strategies and select the best strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 597
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics
    Akkermans, HA
    van Oorschot, KE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (08) : 931 - 941
  • [2] Anjomshoae A, 2017, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V7, P194, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-01-2017-0001
  • [3] Review of supply chain performance measurement systems: 1998-2015
    Balfaqih, Hasan
    Nopiah, Zulkifli Mohd.
    Saibani, Nizaroyani
    Al-Nory, Malak T.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2016, 82 : 135 - 150
  • [4] Barlas Y, 1996, SYST DYNAM REV, V12, P183, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-4
  • [6] The causal relationships between performance drivers and outcomes Reinforcing balanced scorecards' implementation through system dynamics models
    Barnabe, Federico
    Busco, Cristiano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2012, 8 (04) : 528 - +
  • [7] A "system dynamics-based Balanced Scorecard" to support strategic decision making Insights from a case study
    Barnabe, Federico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 60 (05) : 446 - 473
  • [8] Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach
    Bhagwat, Rajat
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 53 (01) : 43 - 62
  • [9] An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management
    Bhagwat, Rajat
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (08) : 678 - 690
  • [10] Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach
    Bhattacharya, Arijit
    Mohapatra, Priyabrata
    Kumar, Vikas
    Dey, Prasanta Kumar
    Brady, Malcolm
    Tiwari, Manoj Kumar
    Nudurupati, Sai S.
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2014, 25 (08) : 698 - 714