Processing the ground vibration signal produced by debris flows: the methods of amplitude and impulses compared

被引:25
作者
Arattano, M. [1 ]
Abanco, C. [2 ]
Coviello, V. [1 ]
Huerlimann, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] CNR, IRPI, I-10135 Turin, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Catalonia UPC, Dept Geotech Engn & Geosci, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
Debris flow; Ground vibration signal; Monitoring; Geophones; Amplitude; Impulses; SIMULATION; SYSTEMS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2014.08.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Ground vibration sensors have been increasingly used and tested, during the last few years, as devices to monitor debris flows and they have also been proposed as one of the more reliable devices for the design of debris flow warning systems. The need to process the output of ground vibration sensors, to diminish the amount of data to be recorded, is usually due to the reduced storing capabilities and the limited power supply, normally provided by solar panels, available in the high mountain environment. There are different methods that can be found in literature to process the ground vibration signal produced by debris flows. In this paper we will discuss the two most commonly employed: the method of impulses and the method of amplitude. These two methods of data processing are analyzed describing their origin and their use, presenting examples of applications and their main advantages and shortcomings. The two methods are then applied to process the ground vibration raw data produced by a debris flow occurred in the Rebaixader Torrent (Spanish Pyrenees) in 2012. The results of this work will provide means for decision to researchers and technicians who find themselves facing the task of designing a debris flow monitoring installation or a debris flow warning equipment based on the use of ground vibration detectors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Analysis of the ground vibration generated by debris flows and other torrential processes at the Rebaixader monitoring site (Central Pyrenees, Spain) [J].
Abanco, C. ;
Huerlimann, M. ;
Moya, J. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 14 (04) :929-943
[2]   Transformation of Ground Vibration Signal for Debris-Flow Monitoring and Detection in Alarm Systems [J].
Abanco, Claudia ;
Huerlimann, Marcel ;
Fritschi, Bruno ;
Graf, Christoph ;
Moya, Jose .
SENSORS, 2012, 12 (04) :4870-4891
[3]   Monitoring the propagation of a debris flow along a torrent [J].
Arattano, M ;
Moia, F .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1999, 44 (05) :811-823
[4]   Influence of rheology on debris-flow simulation [J].
Arattano, M. ;
Franzi, L. ;
Marchi, L. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2006, 6 (04) :519-528
[5]   Analysis of different water-sediment flow processes in a mountain torrent [J].
Arattano, M ;
Franzi, L .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2004, 4 (5-6) :783-791
[6]  
Arattano M, 2003, DEBRIS-FLOW HAZARDS MITIGATION: MECHANICS, PREDICTION, AND ASSESSMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, P719
[7]   Analysis of debris-flow recordings in an instrumented basin: confirmations and new findings [J].
Arattano, M. ;
Marchi, L. ;
Cavalli, M. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (03) :679-686
[8]   On the use of seismic detectors as monitoring and warning systems for debris flows [J].
Arattano, M .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 1999, 20 (2-3) :197-213
[9]  
Arattano M., 2014, P IAEG 12 INT C, V3
[10]   Systems and sensors for debris-flow monitoring and warning [J].
Arattano, Massimo ;
Marchi, Lorenzo .
SENSORS, 2008, 8 (04) :2436-2452