Conflicting Motivations: Understanding How Low-Status Group Members Respond to Ingroup Discrimination Claimants

被引：5

作者：

Wellman, Joseph D. ^{[1
]}

Wilkins, Clara L. ^{[2
,3
]}

Newell, Ellen E. ^{[4
]}

Stewart, D. Kamiya ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA 92407 USA

[2] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63110 USA

[3] Wesleyan Univ, Middletown, CT USA

[4] Wilkes Univ, Wilkes Barre, PA 18766 USA

[5] Tulane Univ, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA

来源：

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN | 2019年 / 45卷 / 08期

关键词：

status-legitimizing beliefs; group identification; discrimination claim; SYSTEM-JUSTIFYING BELIEFS; GROUP IDENTIFICATION; SELF-ESTEEM; IN-GROUP; PERCEIVED DISCRIMINATION; JUSTIFICATION; ATTRIBUTIONS; PREJUDICE; CONSEQUENCES; MERITOCRACY;

D O I：

10.1177/0146167218808500

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Previous research has found that among low-status individuals, both group identification (GID) and status-legitimizing beliefs (SLBs) motivate varying responses to ingroup discrimination claimants. SLBs are traditionally thought to motivate decreased support for low-status claimants, while GID is thought to motivate increased liking and support of ingroup members. The current research examines these conflicting influences on ingroup claimants among women (Studies 1a and 1b) and Latino/as (Studies 2 and 3). We find that when SLBs are strongly endorsed (Studies 1a, 1b, and 2) or primed (Study 3), GID does not predict liking or support for a claimant. Only when SLB endorsement is low and identity safety cues are absent does GID predict liking and support for a claimant. Our results suggest that when motivations conflict, SLBs seem to more strongly predict reactions to ingroup claimants.

引用

页码：1170 / 1183

页数：14

共 48 条

[41] Excuse me - What did you just say?!: Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks
Swim, JK
Hyers, LL
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) : 68 - 88
[42] Tajfel H., 2004, Political Psychology: Key Readings, P276, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203505984-16
[43] Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants
Unzueta, Miguel M.
Everly, Benjamin A.
Gutierrez, Angelica S.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 54 : 81 - 88
[44] Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for Affirmative Action among White people
Wellman, Joseph D.
Liu, Xi
Wilkins, Clara L.
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 55 (03) : 426 - 437
[45] When Men Perceive Anti-male Bias: Status-Legitimizing Beliefs Increase Discrimination Against Women
Wilkins, Clara L.
Wellman, Joseph D.
Flavin, Erika L.
Manrique, Juliana A.
[J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITIES, 2018, 19 (02): : 282 - 290
[46] Reactions to anti-male sexism claims: The moderating roles of status-legitimizing belief endorsement and group identification
Wilkins, Clara L.
Wellman, Joseph D.
Schad, Katherine D.
[J]. GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2017, 20 (02) : 173 - 185
[47] Racial Progress as Threat to the Status Hierarchy: Implications for Perceptions of Anti-White Bias
Wilkins, Clara L.
Kaiser, Cheryl R.
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (02) : 439 - 446
[48] Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias
Wilkins, Clara L.
Wellman, Joseph D.
Kaiser, Cheryl R.
[J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (06) : 1114 - 1119

← 1 2 3 4 5 →