Utility of Smart Arc CDR for intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

被引:7
作者
Hatanaka, Shogo [1 ]
Tamaki, Seiichi [2 ,3 ]
Endo, Haruna [3 ]
Mizuno, Norifumi [3 ]
Nakamura, Naoki [3 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Canc Ctr, Asahi Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2418515, Japan
[2] Rikkyo Univ, Toshima Ku, Tokyo 171, Japan
[3] St Lukes Int Hosp, Chuo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
constant dose rate; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; prostate cancer; Smart Arc CDR; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; RADIOTHERAPY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rrt232
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a widespread intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) method, however, VMAT requires adaptation of the radiation treatment planning system (RTPS) and linear accelerator (linac); these upgrades are quite expensive. The Smart Arc of Pinnacle(3) (Philips), which is the software used in VMAT calculations, can select constant dose rate (CDR) mode. This approach has a low initial cost because the linac upgrade is not required. The objective of this study was to clarify the utility of CDR mode for prostate IMRT. Pinnacle(3) and Clinac 21EX linac (Varian, 10 MV X-rays) were used for planning. The plans were created for 28 patients using a fixed multi-field IMRT (f-IMRT), VMAT and CDR techniques. The dose distribution results were classified into three groups: optimal, suboptimal and reject. For the f-IMRT, VMAT and CDR results, 25, 26 and 21 patients were classified as 'optimal', respectively. Our results show a significant reduction in the achievement rate of 'optimal' for a CDR when the bladder volume is < 100 cm(3). The total numbers of monitoring units (MUs) (average +/- 1 sigma) were 469 +/- 53, 357 +/- 35 and 365 +/- 33; the average optimization times were similar to 50 min, 2 h and 2 h 40 min, and the irradiation times were similar to 280 s, 60 s and 110 s, respectively. CDR can reduce the total MUs and irradiation time compared with f-IMRT, and CDR has a lower initial cost compared with VMAT. Thus, for institutions that do not currently perform VMAT, CDR is a useful option. Additionally, in the context of patient identification, bladder volume may be useful.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 779
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[2]   Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning [J].
Bzdusek, Karl ;
Friberger, Henrik ;
Eriksson, Kjell ;
Hardemark, Bjorn ;
Robinson, David ;
Kaus, Michael .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2328-2339
[3]   Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy [J].
De Crevoisier, R ;
Tucker, SL ;
Dong, L ;
Mohan, R ;
Cheung, R ;
Cox, JD ;
Kuban, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (04) :965-973
[4]  
Hardemark B., 2003, Direct machine parameter optimization with RayMachine in Pinnacle
[5]   RADIATION DOSE-VOLUME EFFECTS IN RADIATION-INDUCED RECTAL INJURY [J].
Michalski, Jeff M. ;
Gay, Hiram ;
Jackson, Andrew ;
Tucker, Susan L. ;
Deasy, Joseph O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :S123-S129
[6]   The relationship between the bladder volume and optimal treatment planning in definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer [J].
Nakamura, Naoki ;
Shikama, Naoto ;
Takahashi, Osamu ;
Sekiguchi, Kenji ;
Hama, Yukihiro ;
Akahane, Keiko ;
Nakagawa, Keiichi .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2012, 51 (06) :730-734
[7]   Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc [J].
Otto, Karl .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (01) :310-317
[8]   VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY FOR DELIVERY OF PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY [J].
Palma, David ;
Vollans, Emily ;
James, Kerry ;
Nakano, Sandy ;
Moiseenko, Vitali ;
Shaffer, Richard ;
Mckenzie, Michael ;
Morris, James ;
Otto, Karl .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04) :996-1001
[9]   Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with conventional conformal radiotherapy for complex-shaped tumors [J].
Pirzkall, A ;
Carol, M ;
Lohr, F ;
Höss, A ;
Wannenmacher, M ;
Debus, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (05) :1371-1380
[10]   A COMPARISON OF OUT-OF-FIELD DOSE AND ITS CONSTITUENT COMPONENTS FOR INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY VERSUS CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY: IMPLICATIONS FOR CARCINOGENESIS [J].
Ruben, Jeremy D. ;
Lancaster, Craig M. ;
Jones, Phillip ;
Smith, Ryan L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05) :1458-1464