Too complicated and impractical? An exploratory study on the role of energy system models in municipal decision-making processes in Denmark

被引:33
作者
Ben Amer, Sara [1 ]
Gregg, Jay S. [2 ]
Sperling, Karl [3 ]
Drysdale, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Bldg 424, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] UNEP DTU Partnership, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Planning, Rendsburggade 14, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Planning, AC Meyers Vaenge 15, DK-2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Energy system models; Strategic energy planning; Energy modelling; Urban energy transitions; Municipal decision-making; Cities; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES; DANISH; SIMULATION; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Energy system models can contribute to the transition to low-carbon energy systems by helping devise pathways and calculate costs of energy policies and targets. As such, they are intended to provide support for energy planning, especially at the national level. Since energy system models are often developed outside urban contexts, their municipal policy relevance cannot be taken for granted. It is still unclear to what extent and how energy system models are applied to create municipal energy strategies and who uses them. This exploratory study aims to shed light on these aspects by examining the use of modelling tools and their outputs by municipal planners. We conducted interviews with practitioners from Danish municipalities and evaluated them using qualitative content analysis. This paper finds that the interviewees' use of software tools depends on how they perceive the functionality and complicatedness of the tools. The planners we interviewed prefer spreadsheet based CO2 calculation or evaluation tools to energy system models, which in turn are used by heat supply companies, consultancies or universities. The practitioners we interviewed collaborate with model developers and users to further utilize model outputs. The incorporation of results from models or spreadsheet tools takes place mostly in the beginning of energy planning projects. This study suggests that models and the modelling practice can be improved with: open data, assumptions and models, collaboration across planning levels and improving links between technical modelling and practical implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Aarhus Kommune, 2018, UDGIFTER KONSULENTYD
  • [2] A review of modelling approaches and tools for the simulation of district-scale energy systems
    Allegrini, Jonas
    Orehounig, Kristina
    Mavromatidis, Georgios
    Ruesch, Florian
    Dorer, Viktor
    Evins, Ralph
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 : 1391 - 1404
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, FOLK 1 KVART EFT KON
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, MODELLING DEMAND SID
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, CIT CLIM CHANG GLOB
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, DENM INT NAT EN CLIM, P1
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, DOING QUALITATIVE RE
  • [8] Ben Amer S, 2019, Int J Sustain Energy Plan Manag, V24, DOI [10.5278/ijsepm.3356, DOI 10.5278/IJSEPM.3356]
  • [9] Scenarios for sustainable heat supply and heat savings in municipalities - The case of Helsingor, Denmark
    Ben Amer-Allam, Sara
    Munster, Marie
    Petrovic, Stefan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 137 : 1252 - 1263
  • [10] Of sailors and divers: How researchers use energy scenarios
    Braunreiter, Lukas
    Blumer, Yann Benedict
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 40 : 118 - 126