Long-term results of hand-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced Siewert type II and type III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

被引:9
作者
Zhang, Peng [1 ]
Zhang, Xuedong [1 ]
Xue, Huanzhou [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Hepatol Surg, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery; Gastrectomy; Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; Outcome; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; GASTRIC-CANCER; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; MULTICENTER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; THERAPY; CARDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) combines laparoscopic surgery with the tactile feedback of a hand-assist device for complex laparoscopic operations. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent HALS versus open surgery for the treatment of advanced Siewert type II and type III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 77 patients with advanced Siewert type II and IIIAEG between March 2010 and March 2011. Data concerning the basic characteristics of patients, pathological staging, early postoperative course, and long-term follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results: HALS resulted in significantly lower mean blood loss and mean postoperative hospital stay in comparison to open surgery (P = 0.007 and 0.01, respectively). The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 23.22 +/- 9.36 in the HALS group, which was more than in the open surgery group (18.61 +/- 6.91, P = 0.015). The cumulative 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 52.8% (95% CI 43.07-60.09) for all patients in the HALS group (78.6% for stage II patients and 36.4% for stage III patients). The 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: While achieving similar oncological outcomes to open surgery, the HALS approach resulted in reduced blood loss, shortened postoperative hospital stay, and the resection of more lymph nodes. This analysis suggests that HALS may serve as a less invasive and as successful alternative to open surgery for the treatment of advanced Siewert type II and type IIIAEG.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 205
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Feasibility and safety comparison of laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma with D2 lymphadenectomy [J].
Li, Qiang ;
Wang, Juntian ;
Zhang, Guodong ;
Wang, Jian ;
Yang, Bin ;
Zhang, Zhongtao .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (04) :323-328
[22]   Completely laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early and advanced gastric cancer: a matched cohort study [J].
Moisan, Fabrizio ;
Norero, Enrique ;
Slako, Milenko ;
Varas, Julian ;
Palominos, Gonzalo ;
Crovari, Fernando ;
Ibanez, Luis ;
Perez, Gustavo ;
Pimentel, Fernando ;
Guzman, Sergio ;
Jarufe, Nicolas ;
Boza, Camilo ;
Escalona, Alex ;
Funke, Ricardo .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (03) :661-672
[23]  
Panieri E, 2003, S AFR J SURG, V41, P66
[24]   Laparoscopy-assisted versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer Results From a Randomized Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (COACT 1001) [J].
Park, Young Kyu ;
Yoon, Hong Man ;
Kim, Young-Woo ;
Park, Ji Yeon ;
Ryu, Keun Won ;
Lee, Young-Joon ;
Jeong, Oh ;
Yoon, Ki Young ;
Lee, Jun Ho ;
Lee, Sang Eok ;
Yu, Wansik ;
Jeong, Sang-Ho ;
Kim, Taebong ;
Kim, Sohee ;
Nam, Byoung-Ho .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 267 (04) :638-645
[25]   Outcomes and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Analysis on 65 patients operated on by conventional or robot-assisted minimal access procedures [J].
Pugliese, R. ;
Maggioni, D. ;
Sansonna, F. ;
Feffari, G. C. ;
Forgione, A. ;
Costanzi, A. ;
Magistro, C. ;
Pauna, J. ;
Di Lernia, S. ;
Citterio, D. ;
Brambilla, C. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (03) :281-288
[26]   The prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with local decontamination - A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial [J].
Schardey, HM ;
Joosten, U ;
Finke, U ;
Staubach, KH ;
Schauer, R ;
Heiss, A ;
Kooistra, A ;
Rau, HG ;
Nibler, R ;
Ludeling, S ;
Unertl, K ;
Ruckdeschel, G ;
Exner, H ;
Schildberg, FW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (02) :172-180
[27]  
Siewert JR, 2000, ANN SURG, V232, P353
[28]   Benefits of D-2 lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer and pN(0) and pN(1) lymph node metastases [J].
Siewert, JR ;
Kestlmeier, R ;
Busch, R ;
Bottcher, K ;
Roder, JD ;
Muller, J ;
Fellbaum, C ;
Hofler, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (08) :1144-1147
[29]   Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer Lessons Learned From an Initial 100 Consecutive Procedures [J].
Song, Jyewon ;
Oh, Sung Jin ;
Kang, Wook Ho ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Choi, Seung Ho ;
Noh, Sung Hoon .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (06) :927-932
[30]   Determinants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma [J].
Topal, B. ;
Leys, E. ;
Ectors, N. ;
Aerts, R. ;
Penninckx, F. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (04) :980-984