Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Europe

被引:7
|
作者
Toussi, Massoud [1 ]
Isabelle, Bardoulat [1 ]
Tcherny-Lessenot, Stephanie [2 ]
de Voogd, Hanka [3 ]
Dimos, Vasilis [4 ]
Kaplan, Sigal [5 ]
机构
[1] IQVIA, Real World Evidence Solut, Tour D2,17 Bis Pl Reflets,TSA 64567, F-92099 La Def, France
[2] Sanofi Aventis R&D, Epidemiol & Benefit Risk, Chilly Mazarin, France
[3] Mylan, Global Clin Res, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[4] Demo SA, Dept Pharmacovigilance, Med Sect, Athens, Greece
[5] Teva Pharmaceut Ind Ltd, Global Patient Safety & Pharmacovigilance, Netanya, Israel
关键词
Direct Healthcare Professional Communication; pharmacoepidemiology; prescribing behaviour; risk minimisation measures; valproate; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SELECTION BIAS; PREGNANCY; EPILEPSY; SAFETY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/pds.5119
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose This study evaluated the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented following the 2014 referral for valproate in Europe. Methods Cross-sectional survey was conducted over 2-month period in 2016 among physicians who prescribed valproate in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain and Sweden. The web-based questionnaire included five endpoints to evaluate physicians' knowledge on (a) prescribing valproate only for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women if other treatments were ineffective or not tolerated; (b) ensuring supervision by experienced physicians while treating these conditions; (c) considering alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy, regular review of treatment needs and re-assessing the benefit-risk balance in women and girls reaching puberty; (d) informing patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and (e) advising women on effective contraception during their treatment. Results Among 1153 physicians, 95.5% responded prescribing valproate for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women only if other treatments are ineffective/not tolerated; 66.5% supervised while treatment; 76.6% considered alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy; 92.1% informed patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and 94.4% advised patients on the use of effective contraception during its treatment. Overall, 25.8% physicians recalled receiving both educational material (EM) and Dear Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC). All endpoint rates were higher for physicians who acknowledged receipt of both DHPC and EM compared to physicians who did not receive them. Conclusions Although results varied across geography and physician speciality, majority of physicians had good knowledge about the indication and safety aspects of prescribing and using valproate.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Children, care, career - a cross-sectional study on the risk of burnout among German hospital physicians at different career stages
    Richter, Astrid
    Kostova, Petya
    Harth, Volker
    Wegner, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [22] Pregnancy, prescription medicines and the potential risk of herb-drug interactions: a cross-sectional survey
    McLay, James S.
    Izzati, Naila
    Pallivalapila, Abdul R.
    Shetty, Ashalatha
    Pande, Binita
    Rore, Craig
    Al Hail, Moza
    Stewart, Derek
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 17
  • [23] A Cross-Sectional Survey on Pain Management in Dermal Filler Injections from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives
    Shi, Lishuai
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Guobao
    Zhou, Feng
    Gong, Lunli
    Gao, Qiuni
    Fan, Hong
    Xiao, Xiao
    Cui, Haiyan
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (07) : 1417 - 1425
  • [24] Pro-environmental health behaviour and educational needs among pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey
    Jeong, Geum Hee
    Kim, Hyun Kyoung
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (07) : 1638 - 1646
  • [25] Greater Risk of Pregnancy Complications for Female Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Electronic Survey
    Delva, Fleur
    Carcasset, Pierre
    Mouton, Pauline
    Auguste-Virginie, Rivana
    Lairez, Fanny
    Sentilhes, Loic
    Brochard, Patrick
    Joseph, Jean-Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [26] Screening for postpartum depression and risk of suicidality with obstetrical patients: a cross-sectional survey
    Carlie Boisvert
    Robert Talarico
    Jasmine Gandhi
    Mark Kaluzienski
    Alysha LJ Dingwall-Harvey
    Ruth Rennicks White
    Kari Sampsel
    Shi Wu Wen
    Mark Walker
    Katherine A. Muldoon
    Darine El-Chaâr
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [27] The limitations of some European healthcare databases for monitoring the effectiveness of pregnancy prevention programmes as risk minimisation measures
    Charlton, R. A.
    Bettoli, V.
    Bos, H. J.
    Engeland, A.
    Garne, E.
    Gini, R.
    Hansen, A. V.
    de Jong-van den Berg, L. T. W.
    Jordan, S.
    Klungsoyr, K.
    Neville, A. J.
    Pierini, A.
    Puccini, A.
    Sinclair, M.
    Thayer, D.
    Dolk, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 74 (04) : 513 - 520
  • [28] Relationship between sexual dysfunction and burnout among physicians in primary hospital: a cross-sectional study
    Tan, Xing
    Tian, Yu
    Zhu, Ting-Ting
    Ge, Peng-Peng
    Wang, Quan-Jie
    Chen, Rong
    Xu, Rong-Hui
    Meng, Xiao-Juan
    Zhang, Tong-Tong
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [29] Malaria in pregnancy in rural Gabon: a cross-sectional survey on the impact of seasonality in high-risk groups
    Jaekle, Mario J.
    Blumentrath, Christian G.
    Zoleko, Rella M.
    Akerey-Diop, Daisy
    Mackanga, Jean-Rodolphe
    Adegnika, Ayola A.
    Lell, Bertrand
    Matsiegui, Pierre-Blaise
    Kremsner, Peter G.
    Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain
    Ramharter, Michael
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2013, 12
  • [30] EVALUATION OF SELECTION BIAS IN A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY
    SELIKOFF, IJ
    SEIDMAN, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (05) : 615 - 627