Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A cross-sectional survey among physicians in Europe

被引:7
|
作者
Toussi, Massoud [1 ]
Isabelle, Bardoulat [1 ]
Tcherny-Lessenot, Stephanie [2 ]
de Voogd, Hanka [3 ]
Dimos, Vasilis [4 ]
Kaplan, Sigal [5 ]
机构
[1] IQVIA, Real World Evidence Solut, Tour D2,17 Bis Pl Reflets,TSA 64567, F-92099 La Def, France
[2] Sanofi Aventis R&D, Epidemiol & Benefit Risk, Chilly Mazarin, France
[3] Mylan, Global Clin Res, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[4] Demo SA, Dept Pharmacovigilance, Med Sect, Athens, Greece
[5] Teva Pharmaceut Ind Ltd, Global Patient Safety & Pharmacovigilance, Netanya, Israel
关键词
Direct Healthcare Professional Communication; pharmacoepidemiology; prescribing behaviour; risk minimisation measures; valproate; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SELECTION BIAS; PREGNANCY; EPILEPSY; SAFETY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/pds.5119
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose This study evaluated the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures (RMMs) implemented following the 2014 referral for valproate in Europe. Methods Cross-sectional survey was conducted over 2-month period in 2016 among physicians who prescribed valproate in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain and Sweden. The web-based questionnaire included five endpoints to evaluate physicians' knowledge on (a) prescribing valproate only for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women if other treatments were ineffective or not tolerated; (b) ensuring supervision by experienced physicians while treating these conditions; (c) considering alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy, regular review of treatment needs and re-assessing the benefit-risk balance in women and girls reaching puberty; (d) informing patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and (e) advising women on effective contraception during their treatment. Results Among 1153 physicians, 95.5% responded prescribing valproate for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in women only if other treatments are ineffective/not tolerated; 66.5% supervised while treatment; 76.6% considered alternative treatments for women planning pregnancy; 92.1% informed patients about the risks of taking valproate during pregnancy and 94.4% advised patients on the use of effective contraception during its treatment. Overall, 25.8% physicians recalled receiving both educational material (EM) and Dear Healthcare Professional Communication (DHPC). All endpoint rates were higher for physicians who acknowledged receipt of both DHPC and EM compared to physicians who did not receive them. Conclusions Although results varied across geography and physician speciality, majority of physicians had good knowledge about the indication and safety aspects of prescribing and using valproate.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of the Additional Risk Minimisation Measures for Valproate Among Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Six European Countries
    Colas, Sandrine
    Nishikawa, Tiffany
    Dresco, Isabelle
    Kaplan, Sigal
    Marinier, Karine
    Lachacinski, Aude
    Kurzinger, Marie-Laure
    Toussi, Massoud
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 33 (11)
  • [2] Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: A drug utilisation study in Europe
    Toussi, Massoud
    Shlaen, Margarita
    Coste, Florence
    de Voogd, Hanka
    Dimos, Vasilis
    Kaplan, Sigal
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (03) : 292 - 303
  • [3] Effectiveness of risk minimisation measures for valproate: a drug utilisation study in Europe, analysis of data from Spain
    Ehlken, Birgit
    Stevanovic, Irena
    Kaplan, Sigal
    Dresco, Isabelle
    Granados, Denis
    Toussi, Massoud
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2021, 73 (11) : 373 - 382
  • [4] Evaluation of the effectiveness of risk minimization measures for trimetazidine: A cross sectional joint PASS survey among physicians in selected European countries
    von Bredow, Dorothea
    Toussi, Massoud
    Samad, Abdus
    Kaplan, Sigal
    Domahidy, Monika
    de Voogd, Hanka
    Boehmert, Stella
    Ramos, Rita Silveira
    Arora, Deepa
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 (12) : 1385 - 1392
  • [5] A review of the sampling methodology used in studies evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures in Europe
    Jouaville, Laurence Sophie
    Paul, Tulika
    Almas, Mariana Ferreira
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (09) : 1143 - 1152
  • [6] The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross-sectional survey
    Chen, Jiarui
    Cross, Wendy M.
    Plummer, Virginia
    Lam, Louisa
    Sun, Mei
    Qin, Chunxiang
    Tang, Siyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2019, 28 (19-20) : 3599 - 3609
  • [7] A cross-sectional survey among physicians on internet use for epilepsy-related information
    Brigo, F.
    Lattanzi, S.
    Giussani, G.
    Tassi, L.
    Pietrafusa, N.
    Galimberti, C. A.
    Bragazzi, N. L.
    Mecarelli, O.
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2020, 165
  • [8] Cannabis health survey on usage in women with spinal cord injury and knowledge among physicians: A cross-sectional study
    Lee, Amanda H. X.
    Tse, Emmanuel K.
    Nightingale, Thomas E.
    Sachdeva, Rahul
    Walter, Matthias
    Krassioukov, Andrei, V
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2023, 46 (02): : 291 - 297
  • [9] Determinants of sleep quality among pregnant women in China: a cross-sectional survey
    Yang, Ying
    Mao, Jing
    Ye, Zhiying
    Zeng, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Huimin
    Liu, Yueting
    Li, Jie
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (22): : 2980 - 2985
  • [10] Social capital and antenatal depression among Chinese primiparas: A cross-sectional survey
    Zhou, Chi
    Ogihara, Atsushi
    Chen, Hao
    Wang, Weijue
    Huang, Liu
    Zhang, Baodan
    Zhang, Xueni
    Xu, Liangwen
    Yang, Lei
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2017, 257 : 533 - 539