IMPACT OF CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

被引:22
|
作者
Yu, Yusheng [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Han [1 ]
Zhou, Tingting [1 ]
Li, Qing [1 ]
Li, Taoyu [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Zhihong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Med, Jinling Hosp, Res Inst Nephrol, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL | 2014年 / 34卷
关键词
Continuous quality improvement; outcomes; TECHNIQUE SURVIVAL; KOREAN CENTER; SINGLE-CENTER; EXPERIENCE; PATIENT; PROGRAM; COHORTS;
D O I
10.3747/pdi.2013.00123
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the role of a quality improvement initiative in improving clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods: In a retrospective analysis of 6 years of data from a hospital registry, the period between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2008 (control group) provided baseline data from before implementation of systemic outcomes monitoring, and the period between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2011 [continuous quality improvement (CQI) group] represented the time when a CQI program was in place. Peritonitis incidence, patient and technique survival, cardiovascular status, causes of death, and drop-out were compared between thegroups. Results: In the 370 patients of the CQI group and the 249 patients of the control group, the predominant underlying kidney diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. After implementation of the CQI initiative, the peritonitis rate declined to 1 episode in 77.25 patient-months from 1 episode in 22.86 patient-months. Ultrasound parameters of cardiac structure were generally unchanged in the CQI group, but significant increases in cardiothoracic ratio and interventricular septal thickness were observed in the control group (both p < 0.05). Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was significantly higher in the CQI group (97.3%, 96.3%, and 96.3% respectively) than in the control group (92.6%, 82.4%, and 67.3% respectively, p < 0.001). Implementation of the CQI initiative also appeared to significantly improve technique survival rates: 95.6%, 92.6%, and 92.6% in the CQI group compared with 89.6%, 79.2%, and 76.8% in the control group p < 0.001) after 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. Conclusion: Integration of a CQI process into a PD program can significantly improve the quality of therapy and its outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:S43 / S48
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictors for and impact of high peritonitis rate in Taiwanese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients
    Hsieh, Yao-Peng
    Chang, Chia-Chu
    Wang, Shu-Chuan
    Wen, Yao-Ko
    Chiu, Ping-Fang
    Yang, Yu
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (01) : 183 - 189
  • [32] The impact of multidisciplinary pre-dialysis care on the outcomes of incident peritoneal dialysis patients
    I-Kuan Wang
    Tung-Min Yu
    Tzung-Hai Yen
    Hei-Tung Yip
    Ping-Chin Lai
    Chi-Yuan Li
    Kuo-Ting Sun
    Fung-Chang Sung
    BMC Nephrology, 23
  • [33] The impact of multidisciplinary pre-dialysis care on the outcomes of incident peritoneal dialysis patients
    Wang, I-Kuan
    Yu, Tung-Min
    Yen, Tzung-Hai
    Yip, Hei-Tung
    Lai, Ping-Chin
    Li, Chi-Yuan
    Sun, Kuo-Ting
    Sung, Fung-Chang
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [34] Long-term outcomes in children on chronic continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study from a developing country
    Prasad, Narayan
    Rangaswamy, Dharshan
    Patel, Manas
    Gulati, Sanjeev
    Bhadauria, Dharmendra
    Kaul, Anupama
    Gupta, Amit
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 34 (11) : 2389 - 2397
  • [35] Is there impact of mortality prior hemodialysis therapy in peritoneal dialysis patients?
    Koc, Yener
    Unsal, Abdulkadir
    Basturk, Taner
    Sakaci, Tamer
    Ahbap-Dal, Elbis
    Sinangil-Arar, Ayse
    Kose-Budak, Sennur
    Kayabasi, Hasan
    NEFROLOGIA, 2012, 32 (03): : 335 - 342
  • [36] THE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS OUTCOMES AND PRACTICE PATTERNS STUDY (PDOPPS): UNIFYING EFFORTS TO INFORM PRACTICE AND IMPROVE GLOBAL OUTCOMES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS
    Perl, Jeffrey
    Davies, Simon J.
    Lambie, Mark
    Pisoni, Ronald L.
    McCullough, Keith
    Johnson, David W.
    Sloand, James A.
    Prichard, Sarah
    Kawanishi, Hideki
    Tentori, Francesca
    Robinson, Bruce M.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 36 (03): : 297 - 307
  • [37] Comparative Outcomes Between Continuous Ambulatory and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Narrative Review
    Bieber, Scott D.
    Burkart, John
    Golper, Thomas A.
    Teitelbaum, Isaac
    Mehrotra, Rajnish
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2014, 63 (06) : 1027 - 1037
  • [38] Clinical target achievement is associated with better quality of life among dialysis patients: results from a continuous quality improvement program in a Portuguese healthcare network
    Neri, Luca
    Ponce, Pedro
    Matias, Nicole
    Stuard, Stefano
    Cromm, Krister
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (10) : 2705 - 2714
  • [39] Impact of Remote Monitoring on Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis
    Javier Centellas-Perez, Francisco
    Ortega-Cerrato, Agustin
    Vera, Manel
    Jesus Devesa-Buch, Ramon
    Munoz-de-Bustillo, Eduardo
    Prats, Mercedes
    Alonso-Valente, Rafael
    Pedro Morais, Jose
    Jaro Cara-Espada, Paula
    Yuste-Lozano, Claudia
    Montomoli, Marco
    Gonzalez-Rico, Miguel
    Diez-Ojea, Beatriz
    Barbosa, Francesc
    Iriarte, Miren
    Flores, Carmen
    Luis Quiros-Ganga, Pedro
    Espinel, Laura
    Paraiso, Vicente
    Pena-Ortega, Maria
    Manzano, Diana
    Cancho, Barbara
    Perez-Martinez, Juan
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2024, 9 (02): : 266 - 276
  • [40] Health related quality of life of dialysis patients in Malaysia: Haemodialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
    Surendra, Naren Kumar
    Manaf, Mohd Rizal Abdul
    Hooi, Lai Seong
    Bavanandan, Sunita
    Nor, Fariz Safhan Mohamad
    Khan, Shahnaz Shah Firdaus
    Ong, Loke Meng
    Gafor, Abdul Halim Abdul
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 20 (1)