IMPACT OF CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

被引:22
|
作者
Yu, Yusheng [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Han [1 ]
Zhou, Tingting [1 ]
Li, Qing [1 ]
Li, Taoyu [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Zhihong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Med, Jinling Hosp, Res Inst Nephrol, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL | 2014年 / 34卷
关键词
Continuous quality improvement; outcomes; TECHNIQUE SURVIVAL; KOREAN CENTER; SINGLE-CENTER; EXPERIENCE; PATIENT; PROGRAM; COHORTS;
D O I
10.3747/pdi.2013.00123
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the role of a quality improvement initiative in improving clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods: In a retrospective analysis of 6 years of data from a hospital registry, the period between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2008 (control group) provided baseline data from before implementation of systemic outcomes monitoring, and the period between 1 July 2008 and 30 June 2011 [continuous quality improvement (CQI) group] represented the time when a CQI program was in place. Peritonitis incidence, patient and technique survival, cardiovascular status, causes of death, and drop-out were compared between thegroups. Results: In the 370 patients of the CQI group and the 249 patients of the control group, the predominant underlying kidney diseases were chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. After implementation of the CQI initiative, the peritonitis rate declined to 1 episode in 77.25 patient-months from 1 episode in 22.86 patient-months. Ultrasound parameters of cardiac structure were generally unchanged in the CQI group, but significant increases in cardiothoracic ratio and interventricular septal thickness were observed in the control group (both p < 0.05). Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was significantly higher in the CQI group (97.3%, 96.3%, and 96.3% respectively) than in the control group (92.6%, 82.4%, and 67.3% respectively, p < 0.001). Implementation of the CQI initiative also appeared to significantly improve technique survival rates: 95.6%, 92.6%, and 92.6% in the CQI group compared with 89.6%, 79.2%, and 76.8% in the control group p < 0.001) after 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. Conclusion: Integration of a CQI process into a PD program can significantly improve the quality of therapy and its outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:S43 / S48
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors and outcomes of fungal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Miles, Rhianna
    Hawley, Carmel M.
    McDonald, Stephen P.
    Brown, Fiona G.
    Rosman, Johan B.
    Wiggins, Kathryn J.
    Bannister, Kym M.
    Johnson, David W.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 76 (06) : 622 - 628
  • [22] PREDICTORS AND OUTCOMES OF TRANSFERS FROM PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TO HEMODIALYSIS
    Lan, Patrick G.
    Clayton, Philip A.
    Saunders, John
    Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
    Snelling, Paul L.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 35 (03): : 306 - 315
  • [23] Automated peritoneal dialysis versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for people with kidney failure
    Driehuis, Esmee
    Eshuis, Marga
    Abrahams, Alferso
    Francois, Karlien
    Vernooij, Robin Wm
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, (09):
  • [24] Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: A Quality Improvement Report
    Ghaffari, Arshia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2012, 59 (03) : 400 - 408
  • [25] COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS VERSUS AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: RESULTS FROM A USA DATABASE
    Cnossen, Trijntje T.
    Usvyat, Len
    Kotanko, Peter
    van der Sande, Frank M.
    Kooman, Jeroen P.
    Carter, Mary
    Leunissen, Karel M. L.
    Levin, Nathan W.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (06): : 679 - 684
  • [26] Impact of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Modality on Outcomes: A Cohort Study of the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry
    Guilloteau, Solene
    Lobbedez, Thierry
    Guillouet, Sonia
    Verger, Christian
    Ficheux, Maxence
    Lanot, Antoine
    Bechade, Clemence
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 48 (06) : 425 - 433
  • [27] Scientific-technical quality and ongoing quality improvement plan in peritoneal dialysis
    Bajo, M. A.
    Selgas, R.
    Remon, C.
    Arrieta, J.
    Alvarez-Ude, F.
    Arenas, M. D.
    Borras, M.
    Coronel, F.
    Garcia-Ramon, R.
    Minguela, I.
    Perez-Banasco, V.
    Perez-Contreras, J.
    Perez Fontan, M.
    Teixido, J.
    Tornero, F.
    Vega, N.
    NEFROLOGIA, 2010, 30 (01): : 28 - 45
  • [28] Type of peritoneal dialysis catheter and outcomes
    Gallieni, Maurizio
    Giordano, Antonino
    Pinerolo, Cristina
    Cariati, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2015, 16 : S68 - S72
  • [29] The impact of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Ye, Hongjian
    Zhou, Qian
    Fan, Li
    Guo, Qunying
    Mao, Haiping
    Huang, Fengxian
    Yu, Xueqing
    Yang, Xiao
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 18
  • [30] The impact of neutral-pH peritoneal dialysates with reduced glucose degradation products on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Cho, Yeoungjee
    Johnson, David W.
    Badve, Sunil V.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Strippoli, Giovanni F. M.
    Wiggins, Kathryn J.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 84 (05) : 969 - 979