Reliability Attributes and the Maintenance Rule for Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Saldanha, Pedro Luiz C. [1 ]
Ferro, Newton J. [2 ]
Frutuoso e Melo, Paulo Fernando [3 ]
Marques, F. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] CNEN CGRC, RJ, R Gen Severiano 90,S-426, BR-22290901 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] CMatFN, Marinha Brasil, BR-20091 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Grad Nucl Engn Program, BR-21941 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.3303/CET1333148
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Maintenance Rule (MR) is a requirement established by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to check the effectiveness of maintenance carried out in nuclear plants. MR was consolidated in the U. S. in 1996. MR classifies Structures, System or Components (SSC) into two categories: Category (a)(2), the SSCs that reach the intended performance demonstrate that preventive maintenance is being appropriately performed, and category (a)(1), which stands for the SSCs that do not fulfill category (a)(1), and must have established goals, so that the discrepancies can be revised and then return to Category (a)(2). The purpose of this paper is to present a model that can be implemented in a personal computer, which allows the reliability analysis of nuclear power plant safety systems to be performed, starting from a state transition diagram, typically employed in Markovian reliability analyses. The classical Markovian model will not apply if at least one of the transition rates in the state transition diagram is time-dependent, due to equipment aging. To overcome this difficulty, the model is recast into a Markovian model by means of supplementary variables. The algorithm developed for this purpose also estimates the necessary parameters for the reliability analysis, starting from crude failure information available from the plant and using goodness of fit statistical tests for the most commonly employed probability distributions.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 888
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Problems of Normalizing Realiability Indicators for Safety Systems in a Nuclear Power Plant
    R. Z. Aminov
    A. É. Borisenkov
    N. A. Oleinik
    Atomic Energy, 2003, 94 : 278 - 281
  • [32] Reliability and Performance Measurement of Safety-Critical Systems Based on Petri Nets: A Case Study of Nuclear Power Plant
    Jyotish, Nand Kumar
    Singh, Lalit Kumar
    Kumar, Chiranjeev
    Singh, Pooja
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2023, 72 (04) : 1523 - 1539
  • [33] DISTURBANCES IN THE EUROPEAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
    Duchac, Alexander
    Noel, Marc
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-ELEKTROTECHNICKY CASOPIS, 2011, 62 (03): : 173 - 180
  • [34] Reliability Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems of Nuclear Power Plant using Ordinary Differential Equations and Reachability Graph
    Jyotish, Nand Kumar
    Singh, Lalit Kumar
    Kumar, Chiranjeev
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2023, 412
  • [35] Fuzzy probability on reliability study of nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment: A review
    Purba, Julwan Hendry
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2014, 76 : 73 - 80
  • [36] New ways in nuclear power plant maintenance
    Grauf, E
    ATW-INTERNATIONALE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KERNENERGIE, 1998, 43 (06): : 376 - 381
  • [37] Contribution of human reliability analysis to the results of probabilistic safety assessment of the nuclear power plant
    Cepin, Marko
    Prosek, Andrej
    ELEKTROTEHNISKI VESTNIK-ELECTROCHEMICAL REVIEW, 2009, 76 (03): : 139 - 144
  • [38] Reliability modeling of safety-critical network communication in a digitalized nuclear power plant
    Lee, Sang Hun
    Kim, Hee Eun
    Son, Kwang Seop
    Shin, Sung Min
    Lee, Seung Jun
    Kang, Hyun Gook
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 144 : 285 - 295
  • [39] Optimization of equipment maintenance for nuclear power plant
    Zhang, Bao-Feng
    Xia, Hong
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2007, 28 (03): : 117 - 120
  • [40] An analysis of maintenance failures at a nuclear power plant
    Pyy, P
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (03) : 293 - 302