Ambivalent attitudes towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in Germany

被引:10
|
作者
Finck, Carolyn
Meister, Ulrike
Stoebel-Richter, Yve
Borkenhagen, Ada
Braehler, Elmar
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Univ Klinikum Leipzig AoR, Dept Med Psychol & Med Sociol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] DRK Klin Berlin Westend, Frauen & Kinderklin, D-14050 Berlin, Germany
关键词
attitudes; ethical aspects; pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; religion;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a modern technique in reproductive medicine which can be used to diagnose genetic disorders of an embryo. PGD is currently not legal in Germany, still there are debates being held regarding the issue of legalization. Both the internationally "accepted" indications and new or alternative approaches can lead to complex ethical dilemmas. The attitudes towards PGD have rarely been assessed in the general population. Methods: In our study, 2110 persons aged 18-50 years were interviewed about their attitudes towards PGD and related topics. We assumed that religion, world views and the evaluation of PGD would influence the attitude a person has towards this procedure. Results and conclusions: In our survey, the majority of respondents would agree to a restricted legalization of PGD in Germany. Our results also confirmed some of our assumptions but religion did not have the expected influence. The evaluation of costs and benefits of PGD and the feelings associated with this technique explained more of the final attitude whether PGD should remain prohibited in Germany or not. The agreement to a restricted legalization may be connected to an overall rejection of prohibitions made by the state concerning the individual reproductive autonomy. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 225
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Harper, JC
    Bui, TH
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) : 659 - 670
  • [2] Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Traeger-Synodinos, Joanne
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 39 : 74 - 88
  • [3] Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Delhanty, JDA
    Harper, JC
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) : 691 - 708
  • [4] Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Findlay, I
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2000, 56 (03) : 672 - 690
  • [5] Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer
    Lammens, Chantal
    Bleiker, Eveline
    Aaronson, Neil
    Vriends, Annette
    Ausems, Margreet
    Jansweijer, Maaike
    Wagner, Anja
    Sijmons, Rolf
    van den Ouweland, Ans
    van der Luijt, Rob
    Spruijt, Liesbeth
    Garcia, Encarna Gomez
    Ruijs, Marielle
    Verhoef, Senno
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2009, 8 (04) : 457 - 464
  • [6] Attitude towards pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for hereditary cancer
    Chantal Lammens
    Eveline Bleiker
    Neil Aaronson
    Annette Vriends
    Margreet Ausems
    Maaike Jansweijer
    Anja Wagner
    Rolf Sijmons
    Ans van den Ouweland
    Rob van der Luijt
    Liesbeth Spruijt
    Encarna Gómez García
    Mariëlle Ruijs
    Senno Verhoef
    Familial Cancer, 2009, 8 : 457 - 464
  • [7] FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
    Scriven, Paul N.
    Kirby, Toby L.
    Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2011, (48):
  • [8] Pre-implantation diagnosis of genetic disease
    Coonen, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1996, 67 (02): : 81 - 83
  • [9] Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Joris Robert Vermeesch
    Thierry Voet
    Koenraad Devriendt
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2016, 17 : 643 - 656
  • [10] Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Voet, Thierry
    Devriendt, Koenraad
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2016, 17 (10) : 643 - 656