The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population

被引:47
|
作者
Garbarino, Ellen [2 ]
Slonim, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Econ, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Discipline Mkt, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Trust; Reciprocity; Gender; Age; Expectations; Experimental economics; GENDER; MATURATION; ANONYMITY; DICTATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experimental evidence on gender differences demonstrates that women are generally less trusting and more reciprocating than men in Investment Games. However, existing studies typically use a narrow population consisting of college students. To test the robustness of these findings, we report on an experiment using 18-84-year old participants recruited from an online panel. While trusting gender differences are robust across age, with women less trusting than men, reciprocating behavior is not robust across age; gender differences in reciprocating behavior depend on age and amounts received in a complex manner. Regarding trusting behavior, we also find that men and women of all ages trust women and older people more than men and younger people. To understand trust better, we collected socio-economic and demographic information and experimentally measured how much subjects expected different partner types would return. While socio-economic and demographic information explain little of the trusting and reciprocating behavior, expectations explain nearly 50 percent of the reason women trust less than men and why more is sent to women and older people. However, even after controlling for expectations, gender and age differences remain significant in explaining trusting behavior. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 240
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Examining Work Temporality Across the US Latino Population by Nativity and Citizenship
    Park, Sung S.
    Pebley, Anne R.
    Goldman, Noreen
    Sheftel, Mara Getz
    Pratt, Boriana
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2025, 177 (03) : 1289 - 1326
  • [42] Does Paying Back Pay Off? Effects of Reciprocity and Economic Outcomes on Trust Emergence in Negotiations
    Sondern, Dominik
    Hertel, Guido
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2019, 28 (06) : 1053 - 1076
  • [43] Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game
    Gabriele Bellucci
    Tim Hahn
    Gopikrishna Deshpande
    Frank Krueger
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 19 : 165 - 176
  • [44] Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game
    Bellucci, Gabriele
    Hahn, Tim
    Deshpande, Gopikrishna
    Krueger, Frank
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 19 (01) : 165 - 176
  • [46] Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control - A cross-societal study
    Hayashi, N
    Ostrom, E
    Walker, J
    Yamagishi, T
    RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1999, 11 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [47] In reciprocity, we trust: Improving grantmaking through relational philanthropy
    Petzinger, Janis
    Jung, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF PHILANTHROPY AND MARKETING, 2024, 29 (02):
  • [48] The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocity
    Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran
    Mestelman, Stuart
    Nainar, Khalid
    Shehata, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 30 (03) : 368 - 380
  • [49] In Search of Informed Discretion: An Experimental Investigation of Fairness and Trust Reciprocity
    Maas, Victor S.
    van Rinsum, Marcel
    Towry, Kristy L.
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (02) : 617 - 644
  • [50] Ripples of reciprocity: Navigating trust and collective governance in hydrosocial territories
    Slosse, Wannes
    Benavides, Jean Paul
    Branisa, Boris
    Buysse, Jeroen
    D'Haese, Marijke
    Lambertin, Carlos Eduardo Quezada
    Schoors, Koen
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 188