The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population

被引:47
|
作者
Garbarino, Ellen [2 ]
Slonim, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Econ, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Discipline Mkt, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Trust; Reciprocity; Gender; Age; Expectations; Experimental economics; GENDER; MATURATION; ANONYMITY; DICTATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experimental evidence on gender differences demonstrates that women are generally less trusting and more reciprocating than men in Investment Games. However, existing studies typically use a narrow population consisting of college students. To test the robustness of these findings, we report on an experiment using 18-84-year old participants recruited from an online panel. While trusting gender differences are robust across age, with women less trusting than men, reciprocating behavior is not robust across age; gender differences in reciprocating behavior depend on age and amounts received in a complex manner. Regarding trusting behavior, we also find that men and women of all ages trust women and older people more than men and younger people. To understand trust better, we collected socio-economic and demographic information and experimentally measured how much subjects expected different partner types would return. While socio-economic and demographic information explain little of the trusting and reciprocating behavior, expectations explain nearly 50 percent of the reason women trust less than men and why more is sent to women and older people. However, even after controlling for expectations, gender and age differences remain significant in explaining trusting behavior. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 240
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neurobehavioral Mechanisms Supporting Trust and Reciprocity
    Fareri, Dominic S.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [22] Boys vs. girls: Gender differences in the neural development of trust and reciprocity depend on social context
    Lemmers-Jansen, Imke L. J.
    Krabbendam, Lydia
    Veltman, Dick J.
    Fett, Anne-Kathrin J.
    DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 25 : 235 - 245
  • [23] Trust, positive reciprocity, and negative reciprocity: Do these traits impact entrepreneurial dynamics?
    Caliendo, Marco
    Fossen, Frank
    Kritikos, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 33 (02) : 394 - 409
  • [24] Socialisation, trust and reciprocity among young people
    Matteo Migheli
    Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 2012, 148 (1) : 77 - 95
  • [25] Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation
    Song, Fei
    Cadsby, C. Bram
    Bi, Yunyun
    MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2012, 8 (02) : 397 - 421
  • [26] Engineering Trust: Reciprocity in the Production of Reputation Information
    Bolton, Gary
    Greiner, Ben
    Ockenfels, Axel
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (02) : 265 - 285
  • [27] Trust, Reciprocity, and Actions: The Development of Trust in Temporary Inter-organizational Relations
    Sward, Anna
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2016, 37 (12) : 1841 - 1860
  • [28] PROMOTING TRUST AND RECIPROCITY IN THE CLASSROOM
    Caballer-Tarazona, Mara
    Garcia-Gallego, Aurora
    Rodrigo-Gonzalez, Amalia
    EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 3698 - 3705
  • [29] Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups
    Sutter, Matthias
    Kocher, Martin G.
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2007, 59 (02) : 364 - 382
  • [30] What's in a frame? Goal framing, trust and reciprocity
    Chaudhuri, Ananish
    Li, Yaxiong
    Paichayontvijit, Tirnud
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 57 : 117 - 135