The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population

被引:47
|
作者
Garbarino, Ellen [2 ]
Slonim, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Econ, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Discipline Mkt, Fac Econ & Business, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Trust; Reciprocity; Gender; Age; Expectations; Experimental economics; GENDER; MATURATION; ANONYMITY; DICTATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2007.06.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Experimental evidence on gender differences demonstrates that women are generally less trusting and more reciprocating than men in Investment Games. However, existing studies typically use a narrow population consisting of college students. To test the robustness of these findings, we report on an experiment using 18-84-year old participants recruited from an online panel. While trusting gender differences are robust across age, with women less trusting than men, reciprocating behavior is not robust across age; gender differences in reciprocating behavior depend on age and amounts received in a complex manner. Regarding trusting behavior, we also find that men and women of all ages trust women and older people more than men and younger people. To understand trust better, we collected socio-economic and demographic information and experimentally measured how much subjects expected different partner types would return. While socio-economic and demographic information explain little of the trusting and reciprocating behavior, expectations explain nearly 50 percent of the reason women trust less than men and why more is sent to women and older people. However, even after controlling for expectations, gender and age differences remain significant in explaining trusting behavior. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 240
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Active Learning on Trust and Reciprocity for Undergraduates
    Rodrigo-Gonzalez, Amalia
    Caballer-Tarazona, Maria
    Garcia-Gallego, Aurora
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [2] Trust and reciprocity in incentive contracting
    Rigdon, Mary
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 70 (1-2) : 93 - 105
  • [3] How to identify trust and reciprocity
    Cox, JC
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2004, 46 (02) : 260 - 281
  • [4] Effects of Inequality on Trust and Reciprocity: An Experiment With Real Effort
    Rodrigo-Gonzalez, Amalia
    Caballer-Tarazona, Maria
    Garcia-Gallego, Aurora
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [5] Are Trust and Reciprocity Related within Individuals?
    Kovacs, Tamas
    Willinger, Marc
    B E JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 13 (01): : 249 - 270
  • [6] Trust and reciprocity: Misunderstandings
    Castelfranchi C.
    International Review of Economics, 2008, 55 (1-2) : 45 - 63
  • [7] Trust and reciprocity in Cyprus
    Ekici, Tufan
    Ergun, Selim Jurgen
    Rivas, M. Fernanda
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 63 : 36 - 49
  • [8] Adolescents' trust and reciprocity toward friends, unknown peers, and community members
    Sweijen, Sophie W.
    te Brinke, Lysanne W.
    van de Groep, Suzanne
    Crone, Eveline A.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE, 2023, 33 (04) : 1422 - 1434
  • [9] Trust and reciprocity among international groups: Experimental evidence from Austria and Japan
    Akai, Kenju
    Netzer, Robert Jiro
    JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS, 2012, 41 (02): : 266 - 276
  • [10] Trust, cooperation, and the tradeoffs of reciprocity
    Haynes, Kyle
    Yoder, Brandon K.
    CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE, 2024, 41 (01) : 26 - 46