The Effects of Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation on Regeneration and Recovery After Nerve Isograft Repair in a Rat Model

被引:16
|
作者
Keane, Grace C. [1 ]
Pan, Deng [1 ]
Roh, Joseph [1 ]
Larson, Ellen L. [1 ]
Schellhardt, Lauren [1 ]
Hunter, Daniel A. [1 ]
Snyder-Warwick, Alison K. [1 ]
Moore, Amy M. [2 ]
Mackinnon, Susan E. [1 ]
Wood, Matthew D. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Washington Univ St Louis, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Campus Box 8238,660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY | 2022年 / 17卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
nerve; basic science; autograft; muscle; nerve regeneration; diagnosis; microsurgery; specialty; ACCELERATES AXON REGENERATION; POOR FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; CONTRIBUTING FACTORS; PROMOTES; PATHWAYS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1177/1558944720939200
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Therapeutic electrical stimulation (ES) applied to repaired nerve is a promising treatment option to improve regeneration. However, few studies address the impact of ES following nerve graft reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine if ES applied to a nerve repair using nerve isograft in a rodent model could improve nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Methods: Adult rats were randomized to 2 groups: "ES" and "Control." Rats received a tibial nerve transection that was repaired using a tibial nerve isograft (1.0 cm length), where ES was applied immediately after repair in the applicable group. Nerve was harvested 2 weeks postrepair for immunohistochemical analysis of axon growth and macrophage accumulation. Independently, rats were assessed using walking track and grid-walk analysis for up to 21 weeks. Results: At 2 weeks, more robust axon regeneration and greater macrophage accumulation was observed within the isografts for the ES compared to Control groups. Both walking track and grid-walk analysis revealed that return of functional recovery was accelerated by ES. The ES group demonstrated improved functional recovery over time, as well as improved recovery compared to the Control group at 21 weeks. Conclusions: ES improved early axon regeneration into a nerve isograft and was associated with increased macrophage and beneficial M2 macrophage accumulation within the isograft. ES ultimately improved functional recovery compared to isograft repair alone. This study supports the clinical potential of ES to improve the management of nerve injuries requiring a nerve graft repair.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple sessions of therapeutic electrical stimulation using implantable thin-film wireless nerve stimulators improve functional recovery after sciatic nerve isograft repair
    Birenbaum, Nathan K.
    Yan, Ying
    Odabas, Arman
    Chandra, Nikhil S.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    MacEwan, Matthew R.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2023, 67 (03) : 244 - 251
  • [2] Conditioning Electrical Stimulation Is Superior to Postoperative Electrical Stimulation in Enhanced Regeneration and Functional Recovery Following Nerve Graft Repair
    Senger, Jenna-Lynn B.
    Chan, Ashley W. M.
    Chan, K. Ming
    Kwan-Wong, Terence
    Acton, Leah
    Olson, Jaret
    Webber, Christine A.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2020, 34 (04) : 299 - 308
  • [3] Conditioning electrical stimulation is superior to postoperative electrical stimulation, resulting in enhanced nerve regeneration and functional recovery
    Senger, Jenna-Lynn B.
    Chan, K. Ming
    Webber, Christine A.
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2020, 325
  • [4] Brief electrical stimulation improves nerve regeneration after delayed repair in Sprague Dawley rats
    Elzinga, Kate
    Tyreman, Neil
    Ladak, Adil
    Savaryn, Bohdan
    Olson, Jaret
    Gordon, Tessa
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2015, 269 : 142 - 153
  • [5] Electrical stimulation accelerates nerve regeneration and functional recovery in delayed peripheral nerve injury in rats
    Huang, Jinghui
    Zhang, Yongguang
    Lu, Lei
    Hu, Xueyu
    Luo, Zhuojing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 38 (12) : 3691 - 3701
  • [6] Electrical Stimulation to Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
    Willand, Michael P.
    May-Anh Nguyen
    Borschel, Gregory H.
    Gordon, Tessa
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2016, 30 (05) : 490 - 496
  • [7] A single session of brief electrical stimulation enhances axon regeneration through nerve autografts
    Zuo, Kevin J.
    Shafa, Golsa
    Antonyshyn, Kira
    Chan, Katelyn
    Gordon, Tessa
    Borschel, Gregory H.
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2020, 323
  • [8] Lidocaine Nerve Block Diminishes the Effects of Therapeutic Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration in Rats
    Keane, Grace C.
    Marsh, Evan B.
    Hunter, Daniel A.
    Schellhardt, Lauren
    Walker, Eric R.
    Wood, Matthew D.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2023, 18 (1_SUPPL): : 119S - 125S
  • [9] Electrical stimulation does not enhance nerve regeneration if delayed after sciatic nerve injury: the role of fibrosis
    Han, Na
    Xu, Chun-gui
    Wang, Tian-bing
    Kou, Yu-hui
    Yin, Xiao-feng
    Zhang, Pei-xun
    Xue, Feng
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [10] Translational Approaches to Electrical Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration
    Ransom, Seth C.
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Lien, Brian V.
    Tafreshi, Ali R.
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Hanst, Brian
    Lehrich, Brandon M.
    Ransom, R. Chase
    Sahyouni, Ronald
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2020, 34 (11) : 979 - 985