The effects of relational structure on analogical learning

被引:26
作者
Corral, Daniel [1 ]
Jones, Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Relational structure; Schema refinement; Schema elaboration; Structured representation; Analogy; Relational category learning; CONCEPTUAL COHERENCE; CATEGORIES; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Relational structure is important for various cognitive tasks, such as analogical transfer, but its role in learning of new relational concepts is poorly understood. This article reports two experiments testing people's ability to learn new relational categories as a function of their relational structure. In Experiment 1, each stimulus consisted of 4 objects varying on 2 dimensions. Each category was defined by two binary relations between pairs of objects. The manner in which the relations were linked (i.e., by operating on shared objects) varied between subjects, producing 3 logically different conditions. In Experiment 2, each stimulus consisted of 4 objects varying on 3 dimensions. Categories were defined by three binary relations, leading to six logically different conditions. Various learning models were compared to the behavioral data, based on the theory of schema refinement. The results highlight several shortcomings of schema refinement as a model of relational learning: (1) it can make unreasonable demands on working memory, (2) it does not allow schemas to grow in complexity, and (3) it incorrectly predicts learning is insensitive to relational structure. We propose schema elaboration as an additional mechanism that provides a more complete account, and we relate this mechanism to previous proposals regarding interactions between analogy and representation construction. The current findings may advance understanding of the cognitive mechanisms involved in learning and representing relational concepts. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 300
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Category learning in the context of co-presented items [J].
Andrews, Janet K. ;
Livingston, Kenneth R. ;
Kurtz, Kenneth J. .
COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2011, 12 (02) :161-175
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, SCRIPTS PLANS GOALS
[3]   A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Alfonso-Reese, LA ;
Turken, AU ;
Waldron, EM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) :442-481
[4]   Working memory: Looking back and looking forward [J].
Baddeley, A .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 4 (10) :829-839
[5]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[6]  
Carlson L., 2004, P 33 ANN C COGN SCI, P2643
[7]  
Chalmers D. J., 1992, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, V4, P185, DOI 10.1080/09528139208953747
[8]   PERCEPTION IN CHESS [J].
CHASE, WG ;
SIMON, HA .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 4 (01) :55-81
[9]   CATEGORIZATION AND REPRESENTATION OF PHYSICS PROBLEMS BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES [J].
CHI, MTH ;
FELTOVICH, PJ ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1981, 5 (02) :121-152
[10]   EFFECTS OF SCHEMA ACQUISITION AND RULE AUTOMATION ON MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING TRANSFER [J].
COOPER, G ;
SWELLER, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 79 (04) :347-362