Key factors influencing water diffusion in aromatic PA membrane: Hydrates, nanochannels and functional groups

被引:19
|
作者
Gai, Jing-Gang [1 ]
Gong, Xiao-Lei [1 ]
Kang, Wu-Li [1 ]
Zhang, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Wei-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Polymer Res Inst, State Key Lab Polymer Mat Engn, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
crosslinking; membrane; polyamide; simulation; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATION; OSMOSIS MEMBRANE; DESALINATION; COMPOSITE; PURIFICATION; ADSORPTION; POLYAMIDE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.028
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Desalination by aromatic polyamide (PA) composite membranes is currently the most important technology of solving the global freshwater crisis. However, understanding the main factors influencing water diffusion in the desalination process remains a major hurdle in designing new membrane materials. Here, we investigate the key roles of the hydrates, the nanochannels in a PA membrane and the functional groups of the membrane on water diffusion by molecular dynamic simulations. Results show that the membrane can strongly hinder the diffusions of water molecules via both geometrical obstruction and water-membrane interaction when the radius of the water diffusion channel in the membrane is less than 8.75 angstrom. Conversely, the membrane has little influence on water diffusion. In a dilute NaCl solution, the effect of salt ions on the overall diffusion behavior of water can be neglected because only a small quantity of water molecules form hydrates. Almost all Na+ and Cl-, on the contrary, can form hydrates, which could explain why the PA membrane has a higher rejection level to salt ions rather than to water in seawater. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Empirical Study of Key Factors Influencing on IOIS Diffusion
    Wang, Jiao
    Sun, Lin
    Zhang, Xin
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICIM2018), 2018, : 112 - 116
  • [2] Diatomite-chitosan composite with abundant functional groups as efficient adsorbent for vanadium removal: Key influencing factors and influence of surface functional groups
    Song, Junying
    Cao, Xiaoqiang
    Huang, Zhanbin
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS, 2022, 367
  • [3] Factors influencing RAGE lateral diffusion in the cell membrane
    Syed, Aleem
    Zhu, Qiaochu
    Smith, Emily
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [4] Physiological factors influencing pulmonary capillary volume and membrane diffusion
    Rouatbi, S.
    Ouahchi, Y. F.
    Ben Salah, C.
    Ben Saad, H.
    Harrabi, I.
    Tabka, Z.
    Guenard, H.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2006, 23 (03) : 211 - 218
  • [5] FACTORS INFLUENCING PASSIVE DIFFUSION OF IRON ACROSS A SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE
    MUNCHENB.P
    DAVIS, PS
    DELLER, PJ
    GUT, 1968, 9 (02) : 250 - &
  • [6] Factors Influencing the Variation in Phytoplankton Functional Groups in Fuchunjiang Reservoir
    Zhang P.
    Wang W.
    Zhu M.-Y.
    Guo C.-X.
    Zou W.
    Xu H.
    Zhu G.-W.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (01): : 181 - 193
  • [7] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ANALYSIS OF POLYMER SURFACE FUNCTIONAL-GROUPS
    BONAFINI, JA
    MCCARTHY, TJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 189 (APR-): : 82 - POLY
  • [8] Diffusion Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Water Vapor in Asphalt Mixture
    Li H.
    Yang B.
    Ge N.
    Zhang H.
    Xie N.
    Zhang Y.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2022, 50 (09): : 1321 - 1330
  • [9] Key Factors Influencing Adherence to High-Intensity Functional Training
    Heinrich, Katie M.
    Carlisle, Taran
    Frye, Jacob
    Gilmore, Katelyn
    Stevenson, Sarah J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 434 - 434
  • [10] Phytoplankton Functional Groups Variation and Influencing Factors in a Shallow Temperate Lake
    Tian, Chang
    Hao, Daping
    Pei, Haiyan
    Doblin, Martina A.
    Ren, Ying
    Wei, Jielin
    Feng, Yawei
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2018, 90 (06) : 510 - 519