Higher Complications During the Waiting Period for Interval Cholecystectomy in Patients With Mild Biliary Pancreatitis

被引:0
|
作者
Tozlu, Mukaddes [1 ,4 ]
Karaca, Busra [2 ]
Acar, Sencan [1 ]
Toka, Bilal [3 ]
Karacaer, Cengiz [2 ]
Eminler, Ahmet Tarik [1 ]
Koeksal, Aydin S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Sakarya, Turkey
[2] Sakarya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Internal Med, Sakarya, Turkey
[3] Silivri Anadolu Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Sakarya Univ, Gastroenterol Clin, TR-54290 Adapazari, Sakarya, Turkey
关键词
acute biliary pancreatitis; gallstone; complications; cholecystectomy; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DELAYED CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0000000000001094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Although current guidelines recommend cholecystectomy during the same admission in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), it involves a waiting list most of the time. We aimed to assess the risk of complications and determine predictors during the waiting period for cholecystectomy after the first episode of ABP. Methods:A prospective observational study was conducted in patients with mild ABP. Follow-ups were done by phone calls or using electronic health records for a maximum of 6 months after discharge or until cholecystectomy. Results:A total of 194 patients were included in the study. Although all patients were referred to surgeons, only 81 (41.8%) underwent cholecystectomy within 6 months after discharge. During the observation period, gallstone-related biliary events (GRBEs) developed in 68 (35.1%) patients, which included biliary colic, recurrent ABP, acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallbladder perforation, cholangitis, and liver abscess. The overall readmission rate was 25.2%, with 44.8% occurred within 4 weeks after discharge. The odds ratio of any complication was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.42 to 1.76, P=0.028) and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.42 to 1.78, P=0.009) in the patients who did not have surgery within 2 to 7 days and 8 to 15 days, respectively. A 4-fold increased risk of readmission was detected (95% CI, 1.16 to 13.70, P=0.019) if cholecystectomy was not performed within 31 to 90 days. The patients who developed complications had significantly higher C-reactive protein at admission, longer waiting time, and had 3 or more gallstones on imaging. Conclusions:Interval cholecystectomy was associated with a high risk of complications during the waiting period in patients with mild ABP.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 660
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Early elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same hospital admission after recovery of an attack of mild acute biliary pancreatitis: is it feasible and safe?
    Abdelkader, Ashraf M.
    Elwan, Taher H.
    Hassanien, Sharaf E. Ali
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [22] Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis in pediatric patients
    Capparelli, Mauro Ariel
    Dominguez, Maria Victoria
    Cotignola, Luciana
    Ortiz, Ramiro
    D'Alessandro, Pablo Damian
    Ayarzabal, Victor Hugo
    Barrenechea, Marcelo Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY OPEN, 2023, 4
  • [23] Acute biliary pancreatitis during pregnancy and in the post-delivery period
    Hot, Semih
    Egin, Seracettin
    Gokcek, Berk
    Yesiltas, Metin
    Karakas, Dursun Ozgur
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2019, 25 (03): : 253 - 258
  • [24] Cholecystectomy and sphincterotomy in patients with mild acute biliary pancreatitis in Sweden 1988-2003: a nationwide register study
    Sandzen, Birger
    Haapamaki, Markku M.
    Nilsson, Erik
    Stenlund, Hans C.
    Oman, Mikael
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 9 : 80
  • [25] Early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with biliary acute pancreatitis
    Nebiker, Christian A.
    Frey, Daniel M.
    Hamel, Christian T.
    Oerdi, Daniel
    Kettelhack, Christoph
    SURGERY, 2009, 145 (03) : 260 - 264
  • [26] Biliary complications during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Jan, YY
    Chen, HM
    Wang, CS
    Chen, MF
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 44 (14) : 370 - 375
  • [27] Same-admission versus interval cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis (PONCHO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    da Costa, David W.
    Bouwense, Stefan A.
    Schepers, Nicolien J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    van Brunschot, Sandra
    Bakker, Olaf J.
    Bollen, Thomas L.
    Dejong, Cornelis H.
    van Goor, Harry
    Boermeester, Marja A.
    Bruno, Marco J.
    van Eijck, Casper H.
    Timmer, Robin
    Weusten, Bas L.
    Consten, Esther C.
    Brink, Menno A.
    Spanier, B. W. Marcel
    Bilgen, Ernst Jan Spillenaar
    Nieuwenhuijs, Vincent B.
    Hofker, H. Sijbrand
    Rosman, Camiel
    Voorburg, Annet M.
    Bosscha, Koop
    van Duijvendijk, Peter
    Gerritsen, Jos J.
    Heisterkamp, Joos
    de Hingh, Ignace H.
    Witteman, Ben J.
    Kruyt, Philip M.
    Scheepers, Joris J.
    Molenaar, I. Quintus
    Schaapherder, Alexander F.
    Manusama, Eric R.
    van der Waaij, Laurens A.
    van Unen, Jacco
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.
    van Ramshorst, Bert
    Gooszen, Hein G.
    Boerma, Djamila
    LANCET, 2015, 386 (10000) : 1261 - 1268
  • [28] The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis A meta-analysis
    Zhong, Fu-ping
    Wang, Kai
    Tan, Xue-qin
    Nie, Jian
    Huang, Wen-feng
    Wang, Xiao-fang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (40)
  • [29] The Impact of Intraoperative Cholangiography on Recurrent Pancreatitis and Biliary Complications in Patients with Gallstone Pancreatitis
    Johnson, Paul M.
    Walsh, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (12) : 2220 - 2224
  • [30] Why are we performing fewer cholecystectomies for mild acute biliary pancreatitis? Trends and predictors of cholecystectomy from the National Readmissions Database (2010-2014)
    Garg, Sushil Kumar
    Bazerbachi, Fateh
    Sarvepalli, Shashank
    Majumder, Shounak
    Vege, Shanthi Swaroop
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2019, 7 (05): : 331 - 337