Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey

被引:111
作者
Arikan, Emre [1 ]
Simsit-Kalender, Zeynep Tugce [2 ]
Vayvay, Ozalp [2 ]
机构
[1] Turkish Air Force Acad, Aeronaut & Space Technol Inst, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Fuzzy; Multi criteria decision making; PROMETHEE; Solid waste disposal; TOPSIS; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; ALTERNATIVES; CITY; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rapidly increasing population, rising living standards and developments in the fields of science and technology cause continuously increase in the quantity and variety of solid waste. This situation results in a further contamination of natural resources. A variety of technologies for solid waste disposal have been developed to reduce the detrimental effects of solid waste to a minimum level. In literature, studies that are focused on solid waste disposal are generally considering thermal, biological, recovery methodologies or they are just devoted for solid waste technologies used in a determined country, city or region. Besides, in this study all alternatives that are currently used all around the world are investigated and suggestions are made based on the idea of possible implementations in Istanbul, Turkey. For that purpose, firstly overview definition and types of solid waste and general information about solid waste management were given. Afterwards, 10 disposal alternatives of solid waste were evaluated via 18 criteria's which are determined by Istanbul Environmental Management Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. experts to select best disposal technology. Three different multi-criteria decision making methods, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution - TOPSIS, Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations - PROMETHEE and Fuzzy TOPSIS were used for the selection. In this comparison current disposal methodologies are evaluated and tried to determine the most feasible one. According to final results, ordered storing and burning systems are selected as top two methodologies for Istanbul case. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   Sustainable solid waste management: An integrated approach for Asian countries [J].
Shekdar, Ashok V. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (04) :1438-1448
[42]   Fuzzy parametric programming model for multi-objective integrated solid waste management under uncertainty [J].
Srivastava, Amitabh Kumar ;
Nema, Arvind K. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (05) :4657-4678
[43]   Multi-criteria GIS-based siting of an incineration plant for municipal solid waste [J].
Tavares, Gilberto ;
Zsigraiova, Zdena ;
Semiao, Viriato .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (9-10) :1960-1972
[44]  
Tekel A., 2007, J CONT LOCAL GOV, V16, P71
[45]  
Temucin T., 2012, P ICMEM C MAN ENG MA, P170
[46]  
Tezcakar M., 2011, ATIKTAN ENERJI ELDES, P1
[47]   Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries [J].
Troschinetz, Alexis M. ;
Mihelcic, James R. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (02) :915-923
[48]  
Ucar M, 2012, THESIS
[49]   Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya [J].
Yay, A. Suna Erses .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 94 :284-293
[50]  
Yigitoglu M., 2011, ALTERNATIF BIR ENERJ, P11