A return on experience from the application of agent-based simulations coupled with life cycle assessment to model agricultural processes

被引:37
作者
Marvuglia, Antonino [1 ]
Rege, Sameer [1 ]
Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete [1 ]
Vanni, Laureen [2 ]
Stilmant, Didier [3 ]
Benetto, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] LIST, 5 Ave Hauts Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] LISER, 3 Ave Fonte, L-4364 Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[3] CRA W, 100 Rue Serpont, B-6800 Libramont, Belgium
关键词
Agent-based model; Multi-agent simulation; Bottom-up model; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Agricultural policy; Green consciousness; LAND-USE; FRAMEWORK; CHALLENGES; SYSTEMS; COMPLEXITY; DECISIONS; LESSONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.150
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agent-Based Models (ABMs) are becoming a widespread approach to model human-environment interactions. They belong to the class of individual-based modelling approaches, which allow a bottom-up representation of the system being modelled, eliciting its macro-level evolution while modelling the micro-level behavior of its individuals. This paper deals with the application of an ABM to simulate future crop patterns in the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg under a pre-defined scenario. The simulated scenario deals with the introduction of a "green consciousness" component in farmers' decisions, substituting a purely rational approach based only on profit maximization. The results of the ABM are used to perform a life cycle assessment of Luxembourg's agricultural system. The paper first describes the difficulties and the challenges connected with building an ABM for agriculture and then shows the results of the selected case study. The results show that, from a lifecycle perspective, a "greenness" criterion aimed only at reducing greenhouse gases emissions reveals patently a sub-optimal choice and causes burden shifts to other impact categories. Finally the ABM-based (bottom-up) approach is compared with a top-down approach applied in a previous study by the same authors to model the same system. Assets and drawbacks of the two approaches are highlighted. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1551
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, ASS GLOB LAND US BAL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, LIFE CYCLE INVENTORI
  • [3] Assessing the Sustainability of Small Farmer Natural Resource Management Systems. A Critical Analysis of the MESMIS Program (1995-2010)
    Astier, Marta
    Garcia-Barrios, Luis
    Galvan-Miyoshi, Yankuic
    Gonzalez-Esquivel, Carlos E.
    Masera, Omar R.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (03):
  • [4] Bandini S, 2009, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V12, pA51
  • [5] Multi-agent simulation for the targeting of development policies in less-favored areas
    Berger, T
    Schreinemachers, P
    Woelcke, J
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 88 (01) : 28 - 43
  • [6] Lessons from a comprehensive validation of an agent based-model: The experience of the Pampas Model of Argentinean agricultural systems
    Bert, Federico E.
    Rovere, Santiago L.
    Macal, Charles M.
    North, Michael J.
    Podesta, Guillermo P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 273 : 284 - 298
  • [7] Agent-based life cycle assessment for switchgrass-based bioenergy systems
    Bichraoui-Draper, Najet
    Xu, Ming
    Miller, Shelie A.
    Guillaume, Bertrand
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 103 : 171 - 178
  • [8] Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems
    Bonabeau, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 : 7280 - 7287
  • [9] Modeling crop rotation in agricultural LCAs - Challenges and potential solutions
    Brankatschk, Gerhard
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 138 : 66 - 76
  • [10] Brightway2, 2016, ADV LIF CYCL ASS FRA