Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development

被引:20
|
作者
Stringfellow, William T. [1 ,2 ]
Camarillo, Mary Kay [1 ,2 ]
Domen, Jeremy K. [1 ,2 ]
Shonkoff, Seth B. C. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Univ Pacific, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Ecol Engn Res Program, 3601 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
[3] PSE Hlth Energy, 1440 Broadway,Suite 205, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
FLUIDS; TOXICITY; USAGE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0175344
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The potential hazards and risks associated with well-stimulation in unconventional oil and gas development (hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and matrix acidizing) have been investigated and evaluated and federal and state regulations requiring chemical disclosure for well-stimulation have been implemented as part of an overall risk management strategy for unconventional oil and gas development. Similar evaluations for chemicals used in other routine oil and gas development activities, such as maintenance acidizing, gravel packing, and well drilling, have not been previously conducted, in part due to a lack of reliable information concerning on-field chemical-use. In this study, we compare chemical-use between routine activities and the more closely regulated well-stimulation activities using data collected by the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), which mandates the reporting of both unconventional and routine on-field chemical-use for parts of Southern California. Analysis of this data shows that there is significant overlap in chemical-use between so-called unconventional activities and routine activities conducted for well maintenance, well-completion, or rework. A comparison within the SCAQMD shows a significant overlap between both types and amounts of chemicals used for well-stimulation treatments included under State mandatory-disclosure regulations and routine treatments that are not included under State regulations. A comparison between SCAQMD chemical-use for routine treatments and state-wide chemical-use for hydraulic fracturing also showed close similarity in chemical-use between activities covered under chemical disclosure requirements (e.g. hydraulic fracturing) and many other oil and gas field activities. The results of this study indicate regulations and risk assessments focused exclusively on chemicals used in well-stimulation activities may underestimate potential hazard or risk from overall oil field chemicaluse.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resilient but not sustainable? Public perceptions of shale gas development via hydraulic fracturing
    Evensen, Darrick
    Stedman, Richard
    Brown-Steiner, Benjamin
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (01):
  • [42] Chemical and bioassay assessment of waters related to hydraulic fracturing at a tight gas production site
    Faber, Ann-Helene
    Annevelink, Mark P. J. A.
    Schot, Paul P.
    Baken, Kirsten A.
    Schriks, Merijn
    Emke, Erik
    de Voogt, Pim
    van Wezel, Annemarie P.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 690 : 636 - 646
  • [43] Objective and perceived effects of hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development: A sociological perspective
    Theodori, Gene L.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [44] Hydraulic fracturing to induce caving: fracture model development and comparison to field data
    Jeffrey, RG
    Settari, A
    Mills, KW
    Zhang, X
    Detournay, E
    ROCK MECHANICS IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 251 - 259
  • [45] Application of the block factor analysis in the implementation of hydraulic fracturing during oil fields development
    Kornev, Alexander
    Zhironkin, Vitaly
    Maksimova, Julia
    ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2023, 28 (04) : 795 - 806
  • [46] Advances in Liquid Nitrogen Fracturing for Unconventional Oil and Gas Development: A Review
    Qin, Lei
    Zhang, Xian
    Zhai, Cheng
    Lin, Haifei
    Lin, Siheng
    Wang, Ping
    Li, Shugang
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2022, 36 (06) : 2971 - 2992
  • [47] Algal treatment of wastewater generated during oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing technology
    Lutzu, Giovanni Antonio
    Dunford, Nurhan Turgut
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 40 (08) : 1027 - 1034
  • [48] New Tracers Identify Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids and Accidental Releases from Oil and Gas Operations
    Warner, N. R.
    Darrah, T. H.
    Jackson, R. B.
    Millot, R.
    Kloppmann, W.
    Vengosh, A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (21) : 12552 - 12560
  • [49] USEPA's study of the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas on drinking water resources
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 106 (11): : 66 - 67
  • [50] Current perspective on produced water management challenges during hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas recovery
    Gregory, Kelvin
    Mohan, Arvind Murali
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 12 (03) : 261 - 266