Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development

被引:20
|
作者
Stringfellow, William T. [1 ,2 ]
Camarillo, Mary Kay [1 ,2 ]
Domen, Jeremy K. [1 ,2 ]
Shonkoff, Seth B. C. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Area, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Univ Pacific, Sch Engn & Comp Sci, Ecol Engn Res Program, 3601 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
[3] PSE Hlth Energy, 1440 Broadway,Suite 205, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
FLUIDS; TOXICITY; USAGE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0175344
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The potential hazards and risks associated with well-stimulation in unconventional oil and gas development (hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, and matrix acidizing) have been investigated and evaluated and federal and state regulations requiring chemical disclosure for well-stimulation have been implemented as part of an overall risk management strategy for unconventional oil and gas development. Similar evaluations for chemicals used in other routine oil and gas development activities, such as maintenance acidizing, gravel packing, and well drilling, have not been previously conducted, in part due to a lack of reliable information concerning on-field chemical-use. In this study, we compare chemical-use between routine activities and the more closely regulated well-stimulation activities using data collected by the South Coast Air Quality Monitoring District (SCAQMD), which mandates the reporting of both unconventional and routine on-field chemical-use for parts of Southern California. Analysis of this data shows that there is significant overlap in chemical-use between so-called unconventional activities and routine activities conducted for well maintenance, well-completion, or rework. A comparison within the SCAQMD shows a significant overlap between both types and amounts of chemicals used for well-stimulation treatments included under State mandatory-disclosure regulations and routine treatments that are not included under State regulations. A comparison between SCAQMD chemical-use for routine treatments and state-wide chemical-use for hydraulic fracturing also showed close similarity in chemical-use between activities covered under chemical disclosure requirements (e.g. hydraulic fracturing) and many other oil and gas field activities. The results of this study indicate regulations and risk assessments focused exclusively on chemicals used in well-stimulation activities may underestimate potential hazard or risk from overall oil field chemicaluse.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Iodide, Bromide, and Ammonium in Hydraulic Fracturing and Oil and Gas Wastewaters: Environmental Implications
    Harkness, Jennifer S.
    Dwyer, Gary S.
    Warner, Nathaniel R.
    Parker, Kimberly M.
    Mitch, William A.
    Vengosh, Avner
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (03) : 1955 - 1963
  • [22] Fluid-rock interactions between hydraulic fracturing fluid and shale oil & gas reservoirs: Experimental insights
    Kaszuba, John
    Bratcher, Jordan
    Herz-Thyhsen, Ryan
    Marcon, Virginia
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [24] The Shale Oil and Gas Revolution, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Water Contamination: A Regulatory Strategy
    Merrill, Thomas W.
    Schizer, David M.
    MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 2013, 98 (01) : 145 - 264
  • [25] A New Diverting Agent Material for Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment in Oil and Gas Industry
    Cai, Bo
    Bi, Guoqiang
    Qiu, Jinping
    He, Chunming
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATERIALS APPLICATION AND ENGINEERING (SMAE 2016), 2016, 67
  • [26] Uncertainty Analysis for Hydraulic Fracturing Modeling in Porous Media Containing Oil and Gas
    Lukyanov, A. A.
    Chugunov, N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2014 (ICNAAM-2014), 2015, 1648
  • [27] Development of a stranded tight gas field in the north sea with hydraulic fracturing
    Langford, Marc
    Westera, Douglas
    Holland, Brian
    Bocaneala, Bogdan
    Norris, Mark
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2015, 67 (04): : 102 - 105
  • [28] Environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing in shale gas development in the United States
    Zhang Dongxiao
    Yang Tingyun
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 42 (06) : 876 - 883
  • [29] Environmental Issues for the Hydraulic Fracturing Applied in the Process of the Shale Gas Development
    Han, Hyeop-Jo
    Kim, Kyoung-Woong
    Na, Kyung-Won
    Park, Hee-Won
    Lee, Jin-Soo
    Shim, Yon-Sik
    ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2013, 46 (01): : 63 - 69
  • [30] Use of deep hydraulic fracturing of formations on oil fields of YUGANSKNEFTEGSZ stock holders
    Samardakov, VV
    Gusev, SV
    Yanin, AN
    Koval, YG
    NEFTYANOE KHOZYAISTVO, 1995, (5-6): : 73 - 76