Treatment completion and costs of a randomized trial of rifampin for 4 months versus isoniazid for 9 months

被引:140
作者
Menzies, D
Dion, MJ
Rabinovitch, B
Mannix, S
Brassard, P
Schwartzman, K
机构
[1] Montreal Chest Inst, Resp Epidemiol & Clin Res Unit, Montreal, PQ H2X 2P4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, Div Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
latent tuberculosis infection; treatment of latent tuberculosis infection; tuberculosis prevention;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.200404-478OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
There is little published information regarding treatment completion, safety, and efficacy of rifampin administered daily for 4 months-a recommended alternative to 9 months of isoniazid for therapy of latent tuberculosis infection. In an open-label randomized trial at a university-affiliated respiratory hospital, consenting patients whose treating physician had recommended therapy for latent tuberculosis infection were randomized to daily self-administered rifampin for 4 months or daily self-administered isoniazid for 9 months. Of 58 patients randomized to rifampin, 53 (91%) took 80% of doses, and 50 (86%) took more than 90% of doses within 20 weeks compared with 44 (76%) and 36 (62%) who took 80 and 90%, respectively, of doses of isoniazid within 43 weeks (relative risks: 80% of doses, 1.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.4]; 90% of doses, 1.4 [1.1, 1.7]). Adverse events resulted in permanent discontinuation of therapy for two (3%) patients taking rifampin, and for eight (14%) patients taking isoniazid. Three patients developed drug-induced hepatitis-all were taking isoniazid. Total costs of therapy were significantly higher for isoniazid. In conclusion, completion of therapy was significantly better with 4 months of rifampin and major side effects were somewhat lower. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of the 4-month rifampin regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 449
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] COMMUNITY-BASED TUBERCULIN SCREENING IN MONTREAL - A COST-OUTCOME DESCRIPTION
    ADHIKARI, N
    MENZIES, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (06) : 786 - 790
  • [2] *AM THOR SOC, 2000, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V161, pS221, DOI DOI 10.1164/AJRCCM.161.SUPPLEMENT_
  • [3] American Thoracic Society Centers for Disease Control, 2001, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V50, P733
  • [4] BLACK M, 1975, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V69, P289
  • [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P735
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2001, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V50, P289
  • [7] Comstock GW, 1999, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V3, P847
  • [8] Comparison of cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis screening of close contacts and foreign-born populations
    Dasgupta, K
    Schwartzman, K
    Marchand, R
    Tennenbaum, TN
    Brassard, P
    Menzies, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 162 (06) : 2079 - 2086
  • [9] DASH LA, 1980, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V121, P1039
  • [10] DAWSONSAUNDERS B, 1990, BASIC CLIN BIOSTATIS