INTEGRATING CONCEPT SELECTION IN A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

被引:0
作者
Singiresu, Manoj [1 ]
Boggavarapu, Kumar [1 ]
Takai, Shun [1 ]
机构
[1] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
来源
DECT2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 5 | 2009年
关键词
Systems; QFD; Concept Selection; Decomposition; Modularization; Software;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Although a similarity between software and product development processes exists, concept selection is not treated as a core stage in software development whereas it is an important stage in product development. In this paper, we propose to apply concept selection methodologies in design engineering (modularized Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and perceptual concept evaluation methodologies) to software development. In particular, we demonstrate how these methods may be used for software architecture and software module concept selections. Modularized QFD matrices help software developers relate customer requirements to software requirements, and then to software module requirements. At the same time, importance of customer requirements is allocated to software requirements and then to software module requirements. These requirements and normalized worth serve as concept evaluation criteria and their weights. The proposed approach is illustrated using image search software as an example.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 169
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Akao Y., 1990, QUALITY FUNCTION DEP
[2]  
Barnett W.D., 1995, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V12, P24
[3]  
CLAUSING D., 1993, Total quality development: a step-by-step guide to world-class concurrent engineering
[4]   Object-oriented software design utilizing quality function deployment [J].
Elboushi, MI ;
Sherif, JS .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1997, 38 (02) :133-143
[5]   PATTERNS OF COMMUNICATION AMONG MARKETING, ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 NEW PRODUCT TEAMS [J].
GRIFFIN, A ;
HAUSER, JR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 38 (03) :360-373
[6]   Determination of information system development priority using quality function development [J].
Han, CH ;
Kim, JK ;
Choi, SH ;
Kim, SH .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 35 (1-2) :241-244
[7]  
HAUSER JR, 1988, HARVARD BUS REV, V66, P63
[8]  
HAZELRIGG GA, 1996, ASME, V118, P161
[9]  
KING R, 1987, BETTER DESIGN HALF T
[10]  
LAMIA WM, 1995, QUALITY FUNCTION DEP, V7, P417