Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?

被引:63
作者
Chambon, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Delattre, Nicolas [2 ]
Gueguen, Nils [2 ]
Berton, Eric [1 ]
Rao, Guillaume [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, UMR 7287, F-13288 Marseille 09, France
[2] Oxylane Res, F-59665 Villeneuve Dascq, France
关键词
Barefoot; Foot-strike; Minimalist shoe; Running; FOOT STRIKE PATTERNS; LEG STIFFNESS; ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR; RUNNERS; BAREFOOT; KINEMATICS; FREQUENCY; INJURIES; FORCES; SHOES;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Many studies have highlighted differences in foot strike pattern comparing habitually shod runners who ran barefoot and with running shoes. Barefoot running results in a flatter foot landing and in a decreased vertical ground reaction force compared to shod running. The aim of this study was to investigate one possible parameter influencing running pattern: the midsole thickness. Fifteen participants ran overground at 3.3 m s(-1) barefoot and with five shoes of different midsole thickness (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 8 mm, 16 mm) with no difference of height between rearfoot and forefoot. Impact magnitude was evaluated using transient peak of vertical ground reaction force, loading rate, tibial acceleration peak and rate. Hip, knee and ankle flexion angles were computed at touch-down and during stance phase (range of motion and maximum values). External net joint moments and stiffness for hip, knee and ankle joints were also observed as well as global leg stiffness. No significant effect of midsole thickness was observed on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. However, the contact time increased with midsole thickness. Barefoot running compared to shod running induced ankle in plantar flexion at touch-down, higher ankle dorsiflexion and lower knee flexion during stance phase. These adjustments are suspected to explain the absence of difference on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. This study showed that the presence of very thin footwear upper and sole was sufficient to significantly influence the running pattern. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 63
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Anderson FRANK C., 1999, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, V2, P201, DOI 10.1080/10255849908907988
[2]  
Bishop M, 2006, J ATHL TRAINING, V41, P387
[3]   GROUND REACTION FORCES IN DISTANCE RUNNING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
LAFORTUNE, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1980, 13 (05) :397-406
[4]   Foot Strike and Injury Rates in Endurance Runners: A Retrospective Study [J].
Daoud, Adam I. ;
Geissler, Gary J. ;
Wang, Frank ;
Saretsky, Jason ;
Daoud, Yahya A. ;
Lieberman, Daniel E. .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 (07) :1325-1334
[5]   Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running [J].
De Wit, B ;
De Clercq, D ;
Aerts, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (03) :269-278
[6]   OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic Simulations of movement [J].
Delp, Scott L. ;
Anderson, Frank C. ;
Arnold, Allison S. ;
Loan, Peter ;
Habib, Ayman ;
John, Chand T. ;
Guendelman, Eran ;
Thelen, Darryl G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 54 (11) :1940-1950
[7]   Stiffness adaptations in shod running [J].
Divert, C ;
Baur, H ;
Mornieux, G ;
Mayer, F ;
Belli, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 21 (04) :311-321
[8]   Mechanical comparison of barefoot and shod running [J].
Divert, C ;
Mornieux, G ;
Baur, H ;
Mayer, F ;
Belli, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 26 (07) :593-598
[9]   Comparing Methods of Quantifying Tibial Acceleration Slope [J].
Duquette, Adriana M. ;
Andrews, David M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 26 (02) :229-233
[10]   Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running [J].
Farley, CT ;
Gonzalez, O .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (02) :181-186