Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy

被引:22
|
作者
Gutt, Carsten N.
Bintintan, Vasile V.
Koeninger, Joerg
Mueller-Stich, Beat P.
Reiter, Michael
Buechler, Markus W.
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Visceral & Trauma Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Surg, Surg Clin Iuliu Hatieganu 1, Cluj Napoca, Romania
关键词
robotic surgery; esophageal cancer; transhiatal esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; robotic-assisted esophagectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-006-0055-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite its reduced aggressiveness and excellent results obtained in certain diseases, minimally invasive surgery did not manage to significantly lower the risks of esophageal resections. Further advances in technology led to the creation of robotic systems with their unique maneuverability of the instruments and exceptional view on the operative field, thus setting the prerequisites for performance in complex surgical procedures and offering new possibilities to a disease notorious for its dismal prognosis. Materials and methods: The robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy technique was used in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lower esophagus that had high medical risk for surgical therapy. Results: Esophageal resection and reconstruction were possible through a robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal approach. There were no intraoperative incidents, blood loss was minimal, and lymph node dissection and removal was possible during the procedure. Early ambulation and conservative treatment of the mild complications that occurred offered a favorable postoperative outcome. Conclusion: The robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy technique is feasible and safe. Complex procedures become less technically demanding with the help of the robotic system and, thus, the minimally invasive approach can be offered for the benefit of selected patients. Further studies are required to confirm these observations and to establish the role of this procedure in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 434
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy
    Carsten N. Gutt
    Vasile V. Bintintan
    Jörg Köninger
    Beat P. Müller-Stich
    Michael Reiter
    Markus W. Büchler
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2006, 391 : 428 - 434
  • [2] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy
    Horgan, S
    Berger, RA
    Elli, EF
    Espat, NJ
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2003, 69 (07) : 624 - 626
  • [3] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation
    Coker, Alisa M.
    Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S.
    Cheverie, Joslin
    Jacobsen, Garth R.
    Sandler, Bryan J.
    Talamini, Mark A.
    Bouvet, Michael
    Horgan, Santiago
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [4] Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    Slavin, Moran
    Ross, Sharona
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S90 - S91
  • [5] Robotic transhiatal esophagectomy
    Broderick, Ryan C.
    Horgan, Santiago
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 : 1 - 5
  • [6] Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    Peng, J. S.
    Kukar, M.
    Hochwald, S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S64 - S64
  • [7] Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy
    Stock, Cameron
    Watkins, Ammara
    Moffatt-Bruce, Susan
    Servais, Elliot
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 33 (03) : 519 - 527
  • [8] Technique for Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    Peng, June S.
    Kukar, Moshim
    Hochwald, Steven N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (08) : 3037 - 3038
  • [9] Technique for Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy
    June S. Peng
    Moshim Kukar
    Steven N. Hochwald
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 3037 - 3038
  • [10] Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it advantageous over thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
    Lin, Mong-Wei
    Lee, Jang-Ming
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (03) : 490 - 491