Gamma Distribution Model in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Through Diffusion-Weighted MRI: A Preliminary Study

被引:7
作者
Borlinhas, Filipa [1 ]
Loucao, Ricardo [2 ]
Conceicao, Raquel C. [1 ]
Ferreira, Hugo A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Biofis & Engn Biomed, Fac Ciencias, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Neurosci & Med INM 4, Julich, Germany
关键词
INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION; PROSTATE; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26599
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The gamma distribution (GD) model is based on the statistical distribution of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameter. The GD model is expected to reflect the probability of the distribution of water molecule mobility in different regions of tissue, but also the intra- and extracellular diffusion and perfusion components (f(1), f(2), f(3) fractions). Purpose To assess the GD model in the characterization and diagnostic performance of breast lesions. Study Type Prospective. Population In all, 48 females with 24 benign and 33 malignant breast lesions. Field Strength/Sequence A diffusion-weighted sequence (b = 0-3000 s/mm(2)) with a 3 T scanner. Assessment For each group of benign, malignant, invasive, and in situ breast lesions, the ADC was obtained. Also, theta and k parameters (scale and shape of the statistic distribution, respectively), f(1), f(2), and f(3) fractions were obtained from fitting the GD model to diffusion data. Statistical Tests Lesion types were compared regarding diffusion parameters using nonparametric statistics and receiver operating characteristic curve diagnostic performance. Results The majority of GD parameters (k, f(1), f(2), f(3) fractions) showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions, and between in situ and invasive lesions (f(1), f(2), f(3) fractions) (P <= 0.001). The best diagnostic performances were obtained with ADC and f(1) fraction in benign vs. malignant lesions (area under curve [AUC] = 0.923 and 0.913, sensitivity = 93.9% and 81.8%, specificity = 79.2% and 91.7%, accuracy = 87.7% and 86.0%, respectively). In invasive lesions vs. in situ lesions, the best diagnostic performance was obtained with f(1) fraction, which outperformed ADC results (AUC = 0.978 and 0.941, and sensitivity = 91.3% for both parameters, specificity = 100.0% and 90.0%, accuracy = 93.9% and 90.9%, respectively). Data Conclusion This work shows that the GD model provides information in addition to the ADC parameter, suggesting its potential in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 238
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NEUROIMAGE
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUR C RAD 2012
[3]  
[Anonymous], CANCER
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]   Investigation of prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging [J].
Doepfert, Joerg ;
Lemke, Andreas ;
Weidner, Anja ;
Schad, Lothar R. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (08) :1053-1058
[6]   Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging for Enhanced Contrast of Brain Tissue Affected by Ischemic Stroke [J].
Grinberg, Farida ;
Farrher, Ezequiel ;
Ciobanu, Luisa ;
Geffroy, Francoise ;
Le Bihan, Denis ;
Shah, N. Jon .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02)
[7]   Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Guo, Y ;
Cai, YQ ;
Cai, ZL ;
Gao, YG ;
An, NY ;
Ma, L ;
Mahankali, S ;
Gao, JH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :172-178
[8]   Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: From scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond [J].
Hagmann, Patric ;
Jonasson, Lisa ;
Maeder, Philippe ;
Thiran, Jean-Philippe ;
Wedeen, Van J. ;
Meuli, Reto .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2006, 26 :S205-U219
[9]  
Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [10.3322/caac.20115, 10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.20107]
[10]   Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Jensen, JH ;
Helpern, JA ;
Ramani, A ;
Lu, HZ ;
Kaczynski, K .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (06) :1432-1440