Communicating Geomorphology

被引:14
|
作者
Brierley, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Geog Geol & Environm Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
Geomorphology; communication; place; environmental management; adaptive management; fieldwork; SCIENTISTS; GEOGRAPHY; FIELDWORK; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/03098260802576899
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Communication strategies emphasize concerns for content (what is said) and process (the way things are said). Scientists have a responsibility to communicate the findings of their research, enhancing prospects that their insights can meaningfully inform management practice. When used effectively, principles from geomorphology provide critical guidance for environmental management. Three key geomorphic messages are outlined here: Respect diversity through communicating spatial and temporal controls upon landscape character and behaviour; Work with nature in conveying the range of behaviour of any given system; and Be proactive by determining the trajectory of landscape change. Uptake of geomorphic understanding reflects, among many factors, our ability to communicate findings clearly. In communicating these messages, different approaches are likely to prove more effective when addressing differing audiences, whether school/university classes, stakeholders, managers, politicians, or the broader community. Collective approaches to learning through dialogue are encouraged as they promote deeper learning, prospectively enhancing the uptake of geomorphic understanding, thereby promoting healthier environmental futures.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 17
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Communicating geomorphology through International English
    Lewin, John
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (01) : 157 - 165
  • [2] Communicating geomorphology: an empirical evaluation of the discipline's impact and visibility
    Clarke, Lucy
    Schillereff, Daniel
    Shuttleworth, Emma
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2017, 42 (07) : 1148 - 1152
  • [3] Communicating geomorphology: global challenges for the twenty-first century
    Gregory, Kenneth J.
    Lane, Stuart N.
    Lewin, John
    Ashworth, Philip J.
    Downs, Peter W.
    Kirkby, Michael J.
    Viles, Heather A.
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2014, 39 (04) : 476 - 486
  • [4] Interpretive field geomorphology as cognitive, social, embodied and affective epistemic practice
    Couper, Pauline R.
    CANADIAN GEOGRAPHIES-GEOGRAPHIES CANADIENNES, 2023, 67 (03): : 430 - 441
  • [5] The dark art of interpretation in geomorphology
    Brierley, Gary
    Fryirs, Kirstie
    Reid, Helen
    Williams, Richard
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2021, 390
  • [6] Refocusing geomorphology: Field work in four acts
    Church, Michael
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 200 : 184 - 192
  • [7] Learning desert geomorphology virtually versus in the field
    Stumpf, Richard J., II
    Douglass, John
    Dorn, Ronald I.
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 32 (03) : 387 - 399
  • [8] Wonder-full geomorphology: Sublime aesthetics and the place of art
    Dixon, Deborah P.
    Hawkins, Harriet
    Straughan, Elizabeth R.
    PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 37 (02): : 227 - 247
  • [9] The field tradition in mountain geomorphology
    Butler, David R.
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2013, 200 : 42 - 49
  • [10] A pedagogy of fluvial geomorphology: Incorporating scaffolding and active learning into tertiary education courses
    Fryirs, Kirstie
    EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2022, 47 (07) : 1671 - 1679