Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD

被引:184
作者
Freeman, RB [1 ]
Wiesner, RH
Roberts, JP
McDiarmid, S
Dykstra, DM
Merion, RM
机构
[1] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
allocation policy; expanded criteria; donor livers; liver transplantation; liver-intestine transplantation; MELD; pediatric liver transplantation; PELD; SRTR; waiting list;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6135.2004.00403.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
On February 27, 2002, the liver allocation system changed from a status-based algorithm to one using a continuous MELD/PELD severity score to prioritize patients on the waiting list. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we examine and discuss several aspects of the new allocation, including the development and evolution of MELD and PELD, the relationship between the two scoring systems, and the resulting effect on access to transplantation and waiting list mortality. Additional considerations, such as regional differences in MELD/PELD at transplantation and the predictive effects of rapidly changing MELD/PELD, are also addressed. Death or removal from the waiting list for being too sick for a transplant has decreased in the MELD/PELD era for both children and adults. Children younger than 2 years, however, still have a considerably higher rate of death on the waiting list than adults. A limited definition of ECD livers suggests that they are used more frequently for patients with lower MELD scores.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 131
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1964, LIVER PORTAL HYPERTE
  • [2] SURVIVAL AFTER REDUCED-SIZE LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION IS DEPENDENT ON PRETRANSPLANT STATUS
    BILIK, R
    GREIG, P
    LANGER, B
    SUPERINA, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1993, 28 (10) : 1307 - 1311
  • [3] Predicting the probability of progression-free survival in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
    Cheng, SJ
    Freeman, RB
    Wong, JB
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [4] Committee on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Policy, 1999, ORG PROC TRANSPL ASS, P82
  • [5] Conn H O, 1981, Hepatology, V1, P673, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840010617
  • [6] DEBROY M, 2003, AM J TRANSPLANT S5, V3
  • [7] Transplant data: sources, collection, and caveats
    Dickinson, DM
    Bryant, PC
    Williams, MC
    Levine, GN
    Li, SQ
    Welch, JC
    Keck, BM
    Webb, RL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 13 - 26
  • [8] Feng S, 2003, HEPATOLOGY, V38, p158A
  • [9] Resection or transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: Outcomes based on indicated treatment strategy
    Figueras, J
    Jaurrieta, E
    Valls, C
    Ramos, E
    Serrano, T
    Rafecas, A
    Fabregat, J
    Torras, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 190 (05) : 580 - 587
  • [10] The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy
    Freeman, RB
    Wiesner, RH
    Harper, A
    McDiarmid, SV
    Lake, J
    Edwards, E
    Merion, R
    Wolfe, R
    Turcotte, J
    Teperman, L
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) : 851 - 858