"Like a dialogue": Teach-back in the emergency department
被引:41
作者:
Samuels-Kalow, Margaret
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAChildrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Samuels-Kalow, Margaret
[1
,2
]
Hardy, Emily
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAChildrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Hardy, Emily
[1
]
Rhodes, Karin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAChildrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Rhodes, Karin
[3
,4
]
Mollen, Cynthia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAChildrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Mollen, Cynthia
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Teach-back;
Emergency medicine;
Health literacy;
HEALTH LITERACY;
INFORMED-CONSENT;
PATIENT COMPREHENSION;
COMMUNICATION;
DISCHARGE;
CARE;
LOOP;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.030
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Objective: Teach-back may improve communication, but has not been well studied in the emergency setting. The goal of this study was to characterize perceptions of teach-back in the emergency department (ED) by health literacy. Methods: We conducted an in-depth interview study on the ED discharge process examining teach-back techniques in two tertiary care centers (adult and pediatric), using asthma as a model system for health communication. Participants were screened for health literacy, and purposive sampling was used to balance the sample between literacy groups. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached for each literacy group at each site; audiotaped, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: Fifty-one interviews were completed (31 parents; 20 patients). Across all groups, participants felt that teach-back would help them confirm learning, avoid forgetting key information, and improve doctor-patient communication. Participants with limited health literacy raised concerns about teach-back being condescending, but suggested techniques for introducing the technique to avoid this perception. Conclusion: Most participants were supportive of teach-back techniques, but many were concerned about perceived judgment from providers. Practice implications: Future investigations should focus on feasibility and efficacy of teach-back in the ED and using participant generated wording to introduce teach-back. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USAColumbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USA
Ouyang, Helen
[J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION,
2015,
313
(20):
: 2027
-
2028
机构:
Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USAColumbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10027 USA
Ouyang, Helen
[J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION,
2015,
313
(20):
: 2027
-
2028