共 50 条
Methotrexate intolerance in oral and subcutaneous administration in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cross-sectional, observational study
被引:0
|作者:
van Dijkhuizen, E. H. P.
[1
,2
]
Pouw, J. N.
[1
]
Scheuern, A.
[3
]
Huegle, B.
[3
]
Hardt, S.
[4
]
Ganser, G.
[4
]
Kuemmerle-Deschner, J. B.
[5
]
Horneff, G.
[6
]
Holzinger, D.
[7
]
Calasan, M. Bulatovic
[1
]
Wulffraat, N. M.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] IRCCS G Gaslini, Largo Gaslini 5, I-16147 Genoa, Italy
[3] German Ctr Paediat & Adolescent Rheumatol, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany
[4] St Josef Stift, Sendenhorst, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen Hosp, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Asklepios Klin Sankt Augustin, St Augustin, Germany
[7] Univ Childrens Hosp Munster, Munster, Germany
关键词:
juvenile idiopathic arthritis;
methotrexate;
adverse effects;
route of administration;
subcutaneous injections;
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS;
PARENTERAL METHOTREXATE;
CHILDREN;
VALIDATION;
THERAPY;
BIOAVAILABILITY;
ASSOCIATION;
TOXICITY;
EFFICACY;
EMESIS;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective Methotrexate (MIX) is the cornerstone disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In Dutch patients, MIX intolerance occurred frequently and was associated with subcutaneous (SC) administration. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MTX intolerance and its association with the route of administration in a German cohort of JIA patients. Methods A cross-sectional study of JIA patients on MTX was performed. Primary outcome was MTX intolerance, which was determined using the validated Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects and MTX intolerance was compared between patients on MTX SC and MIX administered orally (PO). Results Of 179 JIA patients on MTX, 73 (40.8%) were intolerant. The odds of MTX intolerance were higher in patients using MIX exclusively SC compared to exclusively PO (adjusted odds ratio 3.37 [95% confidence interval 1.19-10.0]). There was strong evidence that the former experienced more behavioural complaints (76.1% vs. 47.4%,p=0.001) and weak evidence that they experienced more abdominal pain after MIX intake (43.5% vs. 27.4%, p=0.056). Conclusion The prevalence of MTX intolerance was high and exclusively SC administration of MTX was associated with MIX intolerance and behavioural adverse effects. The prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse effects was at least as high as in patients on MTX PO. The frequently held assumption that SC causes fewer side effects than PO seems unwarranted. Definite answers about the differences between SC and PO administration with respect to safety and efficacy should be obtained by randomised trials.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文