Intelligent Demand Forecasting of Smelting Process Using Data-Driven and Mechanism Model

被引:28
作者
Yang, Jie [1 ]
Chai, Tianyou [1 ]
Luo, Chaomin [2 ]
Yu, Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, State Key Lab Synthet Automat Proc Ind, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
[3] Inst Politecn Nacl, Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados, Dept Control Automat, Mexico City 07360, DF, Mexico
关键词
Alternating identification; data-driven modeling; intelligent forecasting; mechanism model; SHORT-TERM LOAD; ALGORITHM; IDENTIFICATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1109/TIE.2018.2883262
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The demand for electricity for the fused magnesia smelting process is calculated by the moving average of the energy consumption of a given period, which gives the efficiency of the smelting and indicates if the power supply should be cut off. Therefore, demand forecasting is very important for the operation of the smelting process. However, it is difficult to forecast demand since the power changes depend on the smelting process and raw materials. To obtain an accurate model, the mechanism model of the smelting process is combined with the data-driven method using artificial intelligence technology in this paper. The mechanism model is described by a linear model with unknown parameters. The uncertainties and error of the mechanism model are modeled by neural networks with unknown order. The maximal information coefficient method and the rule reasoning are combined to identify the order. To effectively combine the mechanism model and the data-driven model, a new saturated alternating identification strategy is proposed. The results of simulations and industrial applications show that the effectiveness of the proposed intelligent method of demand forecasting has been validated.
引用
收藏
页码:9745 / 9755
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Albanese D., 2018, MINEPY MAXIMAL INFOR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GEN INVERSES THEORY
[3]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[4]   A Strategy for Short-Term Load Forecasting by Support Vector Regression Machines [J].
Ceperic, Ervin ;
Ceperic, Vladimir ;
Baric, Adrijan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) :4356-4364
[5]  
Chai T.Y., 2016, Adaptive Control
[6]   Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Accurate State-of-Charge Estimation of Li-ion Batteries [J].
Chemali, Ephrem ;
Kollmeyer, Phillip J. ;
Preindl, Matthias ;
Ahmed, Ryan ;
Emadi, Ali .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2018, 65 (08) :6730-6739
[7]   ORTHOGONAL LEAST-SQUARES LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS [J].
CHEN, S ;
COWAN, CFN ;
GRANT, PM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1991, 2 (02) :302-309
[8]   Randomized algorithms for nonlinear system identification with deep learning modification [J].
de la Rosa, Erick ;
Yu, Wen .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 364 :197-212
[9]   Electricity Demand Forecasting by Multi-Task Learning [J].
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste ;
Dinuzzo, Francesco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2018, 9 (02) :544-551
[10]   Selecting radial basis function network centers with recursive orthogonal least squares training [J].
Gomm, JB ;
Yu, DL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2000, 11 (02) :306-314