COSLE: Cost sensitive loan evaluation for P2P lending

被引:8
|
作者
Wu, Sen [1 ]
Gao, Xiaonan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wenjun [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Management Sci & Informat Syst, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Business Analyt & Stat, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
P2P loan evaluation; Instance-aware misclassification cost; Differential labelling node cost calculation; Partition-based method; Cost-sensitive classification; CREDIT RISK-ASSESSMENT; DECISION TREE; MODELS; DEFAULT; ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.055
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The loan evaluation is a fundamental task in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Effective loan eval-uation can help lenders make informed investment decisions. Existing methods do not con-sider the return of loans in the core learning stage and thus fail to explore the relationship between the return of loans and their final loan payoff outcomes. In this study, we propose a systematic loan evaluation framework called COst Sensitive Loan Evaluation (COSLE). Specifically, we first develop an instance-aware misclassification cost (IMCO) matrix, which specifies personalized cost for each loan. Then, we present a differential labelling algorithm called DILA cost for assigning node labels and assessing the corresponding cost. By integrating these enhancements into the tree-induction process, we construct a node splitting measurement called COG index. It exploits the relationship between the return information and the final payoff outcome. Additionally, we design the LER evaluation met-ric to measure the ability of a loan evaluation model to increase the lender's return. Finally, the COSLE is used to improve popular tree models. Extensive experiments based on the Lending Club dataset show that our COSLE can effectively increase the lender's return. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 98
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Credit risk assessment of P2P lending platform towards big data based on BP neural network
    Guo, Yiping
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 2020, 71
  • [22] A rejection inference technique based on contrastive pessimistic likelihood estimation for P2P lending
    Xia, Yufei
    Yang, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Yeying
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 30 : 111 - 124
  • [23] Leveraging network topology for credit risk assessment in P2P lending: A comparative study under the lens of machine learning
    Liu, Yiting
    Baals, Lennart John
    Osterrieder, Jorg
    Hadji-Misheva, Branka
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 252
  • [24] Borrower's default and self-disclosure of social media information in P2P lending
    Ge, Ruyi
    Feng, Juan
    Gu, Bin
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2016, 2 (01)
  • [25] Estimating probability of default via delinquencies? Evidence from European P2P lending market
    Nigmonov, Asror
    Shams, Syed
    Urbonas, Povilas
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 63
  • [26] Data-Driven Robust Credit Portfolio Optimization for Investment Decisions in P2P Lending
    Chi, Guotai
    Ding, Shijie
    Peng, Xiankun
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [27] Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Lending Risk Management: Assessing Credit Risk on Social Lending Platforms Using Textual Factors
    Siering, Michael
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [28] A decision tree model for herd behavior and empirical evidence from the online P2P lending market
    Luo, Binjie
    Lin, Zhangxi
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 11 (01) : 141 - 160
  • [29] The use of profit scoring as an alternative to credit scoring systems in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending
    Serrano-Cinca, Carlos
    Gutierrez-Nieto, Begona
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2016, 89 : 113 - 122
  • [30] A decision tree model for herd behavior and empirical evidence from the online P2P lending market
    Binjie Luo
    Zhangxi Lin
    Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2013, 11 : 141 - 160