Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

被引:52
|
作者
Heaman, Maureen I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sword, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [4 ,5 ]
Bradford, Amanda [6 ]
Tough, Suzanne [7 ,8 ]
Janssen, Patricia A. [9 ]
Young, David C. [10 ]
Kingston, Dawn A. [11 ]
Hutton, Eileen K. [12 ,13 ]
Helewa, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Coll Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Gilbrea Ctr Studies Aging, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6N 1Z3, Canada
[10] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[11] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[12] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Quality of care; Measurement; Instrument; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric testing; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; WOMENS SATISFACTION; ANTENATAL CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERSPECTIVES; PROVIDERS; PREGNANCY; SERVICES; RISKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women's ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the "Support and Respect" subscale of the QPCQ and the "Respectfulness/Emotional Support" subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women's ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. Conclusion: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of an instrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care
    Dozier, AM
    Kitzman, HJ
    Ingersoll, GL
    Holmberg, S
    Schultz, AW
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2001, 24 (06) : 506 - 517
  • [42] Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 for prenatal depression screening
    Sidebottom, Abbey C.
    Harrison, Patricia A.
    Godecker, Amy
    Kim, Helen
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2012, 15 (05) : 367 - 374
  • [43] Development and Testing of the Preparation for Labor and Birth Instrument
    Neerland, Carrie E.
    Avery, Melissa D.
    Looman, Wendy S.
    Saftner, Melissa A.
    Rockwood, Todd H.
    Gurvich, Olga V.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2020, 49 (02): : 200 - 211
  • [44] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ)
    Nunes, Rodrigo Dias
    Parma, Gabriel Cremona
    de Campos, Andressa Cardoso
    Locatelli, Paula
    Traebert, Jefferson
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 53
  • [45] Psychometric Testing of a Rehabilitative Care Patient Experience Instrument
    McMurray, Josephine
    McNeil, Heather
    Gordon, Alicia
    Elliott, Jacobi
    Stolee, Paul
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 99 (09): : 1840 - 1847
  • [46] Do active patients seek higher quality prenatal care?: A panel data analysis from Nairobi, Kenya
    Cohen, Jessica
    Golub, Ginger
    Kruk, Margaret E.
    McConnell, Margaret
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 92 : 74 - 81
  • [47] A patient-centred instrument for assessment of quality of breast cancer care: results of a pilot questionnaire
    de Kok, M.
    Sixma, H. J. M.
    van der Weijden, T.
    Kessels, A. G. H.
    Dirksen, C. D.
    Spijkers, K. F. J.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    Roukema, J. A.
    van der Ent, F. W. C.
    Finaly-Marais, C.
    von Meyenfeldt, M. F.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06): : e40
  • [48] The Leuven questionnaire for Patient Self-care during Chemotherapy (L-PaSC): Instrument development and psychometric evaluation
    Coolbrandt, Annemarie
    Van den Heede, Koen
    Clemens, Kathleen
    Milisen, Koen
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Wildiers, Hans
    Verslype, Chris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2013, 17 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [49] A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing
    Kaltenbrunner, Monica
    Bengtsson, Lars
    Mathiassen, Svend Erik
    Engstrom, Maria
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [50] Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives' perception of quality of geriatric care
    Verho, H
    Arnetz, JE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (03) : 197 - 206