Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

被引:52
|
作者
Heaman, Maureen I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sword, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [4 ,5 ]
Bradford, Amanda [6 ]
Tough, Suzanne [7 ,8 ]
Janssen, Patricia A. [9 ]
Young, David C. [10 ]
Kingston, Dawn A. [11 ]
Hutton, Eileen K. [12 ,13 ]
Helewa, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Coll Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Gilbrea Ctr Studies Aging, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6N 1Z3, Canada
[10] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[11] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[12] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Quality of care; Measurement; Instrument; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric testing; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; WOMENS SATISFACTION; ANTENATAL CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERSPECTIVES; PROVIDERS; PREGNANCY; SERVICES; RISKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women's ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the "Support and Respect" subscale of the QPCQ and the "Respectfulness/Emotional Support" subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women's ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. Conclusion: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and testing of the KERNset: an instrument to assess the quality of telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care services
    Smits, Marleen
    Keizer, Ellen
    Ram, Paul
    Giesen, Paul
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [32] Development and validation of a neonatal intensive care parent satisfaction instrument
    Latour, Jos M.
    Duivenvoorden, Hugo J.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    van Goudoever, Johannes B.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (05) : 554 - 559
  • [33] Attitudes of intensive care nurses towards brain death and organ transplantation: instrument development and testing
    Kim, JR
    Fisher, MJ
    Elliott, D
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 53 (05) : 571 - 582
  • [34] Quality of prenatal care and maternal fetal attachment among primigravid mothers in the Philippines: A cross sectional study
    Gonzales Jr, Artemio M.
    Barcelo, Teresita I.
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 127
  • [35] Development and testing of the KERNset: an instrument to assess the quality of telephone triage in out-of-hours primary care services
    Marleen Smits
    Ellen Keizer
    Paul Ram
    Paul Giesen
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [36] Development and pilot testing of a questionnaire to assess sensory quality control (SQC) knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of food company employees
    Onojakpor, Ogheneyoma
    de Kock, Henrietta L.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2020, 86
  • [37] Development and validation of the Asian Diabetes Quality of Life (AsianDQOL) Questionnaire
    Goh, S. G. K.
    Rusli, B. N.
    Khalid, B. A. K.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 108 (03) : 489 - 498
  • [38] Adequate Prenatal Care: An Integrative Review
    Michel, Alexandra
    Fontenot, Holly
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 68 (02) : 233 - 247
  • [39] Development and Psychometric Testing of the Healthy Aging Instrument
    Thiamwong, Ladda
    Maneesriwongul, Wantana
    Malathum, Porntip
    Jitapunkul, Sutthichai
    Vorapongsathorn, Thavatchai
    Stewart, Anita L.
    PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 12 (04): : 285 - 296
  • [40] The Assessment of Quality of life at the End of Life (AQEL) questionnaire: a brief but comprehensive instrument for use in patients with cancer in palliative care
    Henoch, Ingela
    Axelsson, Bertil
    Bergman, Bengt
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (05) : 739 - 750