Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

被引:52
|
作者
Heaman, Maureen I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sword, Wendy A. [4 ,5 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [4 ,5 ]
Bradford, Amanda [6 ]
Tough, Suzanne [7 ,8 ]
Janssen, Patricia A. [9 ]
Young, David C. [10 ]
Kingston, Dawn A. [11 ]
Hutton, Eileen K. [12 ,13 ]
Helewa, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Coll Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Coll Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Gilbrea Ctr Studies Aging, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Paediat, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[8] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[9] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6N 1Z3, Canada
[10] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IWK Hlth Ctr, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8, Canada
[11] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[12] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Prenatal care; Quality of care; Measurement; Instrument; Reliability; Validity; Psychometric testing; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; WOMENS SATISFACTION; ANTENATAL CARE; LOW-INCOME; PERSPECTIVES; PROVIDERS; PREGNANCY; SERVICES; RISKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-14-188
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods: Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women's ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r = 0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r = 0.63) between the "Support and Respect" subscale of the QPCQ and the "Respectfulness/Emotional Support" subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women's ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. Conclusion: The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A questionnaire to measure the quality of midwifery care in the postpartum period from women's point of view: development and psychometric testing of MMAYpostpartum
    Peters, Mirjam
    Kolip, Petra
    Schafers, Rainhild
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Initial development and psychometric testing of an instrument to measure the quality of children's end-of-life care
    Widger, Kimberley
    Tourangeau, Ann E.
    Steele, Rose
    Streiner, David L.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
  • [23] Cross-Cultural Compatibility and Psychometric Characteristics to Enhance Maternal Health during Pregnancy: Adapting the Prenatal Care Quality Questionnaire into Persian
    Shaghaghi, Fatemeh
    Esmaily, Habibollah
    Jamali, Jamshid
    Latifnejad, Robab
    Abedian, Zahra
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [24] Implementation challenges and outcomes of a randomized controlled pilot study of a group prenatal care model in Malawi and Tanzania
    Patil, Crystal L.
    Klima, Carrie S.
    Steffen, Alana D.
    Leshabari, Sebalda C.
    Pauls, Heather
    Norr, Kathleen F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 139 (03) : 290 - 296
  • [25] Cigarette dependence questionnaire: development and psychometric testing with male smokers
    Huang, Chih-Ling
    Lin, Hsi-Hui
    Wang, Hsiu-Hung
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (10) : 2341 - 2349
  • [26] Developing and testing an instrument for the measurement of individual care
    Suhonen, R
    Välimäki, M
    Katajisto, J
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (05) : 1253 - 1263
  • [27] Development of a health-related quality of life instrument for children: The Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children
    Bouman, NH
    Koot, HM
    Van Gils, APJM
    Verhulst, FC
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1999, 14 (05) : 829 - 846
  • [28] Do the quality of prenatal care have an impact on obstetrical outcomes?
    Leticee, N.
    Vendittelli, F.
    Ughetto, S.
    Janky, E.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2013, 41 (05): : 282 - 288
  • [29] Development and testing of an instrument in Western Norway to measure the quality of referral information from primary care to specialised mental health care
    Hartveit, Miriam
    Aslaksen, Aslak
    Vanhaecht, Kris
    Thorsen, Olav
    Hove, Oddbjorn
    Haug, Kjell
    Hovlid, Einar
    Assmus, Jorg
    Biringer, Eva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION, 2015, 18 (2-3) : 35 - 47
  • [30] PHQ-2 as First Screening Instrument of Prenatal Depression in Primary Health Care, Spain
    de la Fe Rodriguez-Munoz, Maria
    Castelao Legazpi, Pilar Carolina
    Olivares Crespo, Maria Eugenia
    Soto Balbuena, Cristina
    Izquierdo Mendez, Nuria
    Ferrer Barrientos, Francisco Javier
    Le Huynh-Nhu
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2017, 91