Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure in primary care

被引:18
作者
van Dijk, Inge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lenferink, Nick Scholten Meilink [4 ]
Lucassen, Peter L. B. J. [3 ]
Mercer, Stewart W. [5 ]
van Weel, Chris [3 ,6 ]
Hartman, Tim C. Olde [3 ]
Speckens, Anne E. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] MoleMann Mental Hlth, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Med Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Dept Primary Care Res Gen Practice & Primary Care, Glasgow G12 9LX, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
Empathy; physician-patient relations; primary health care; surveys and questionnaires; process assessment; validation studies; PHYSICIAN EMPATHY; GENERAL-PRACTICE; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; DEPRIVATION; AREAS;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmw116
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Empathy is an essential skill in doctor-patient communication with positive effects on compliance, patient satisfaction and symptom duration. There are no validated patient-rated empathy measures available in Dutch. Objective. To investigate the validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure, a widely used 10-item patient-rated questionnaire of physician empathy. Methods. After translation and back translation, the Dutch CARE Measure was distributed among patients from 19 general practitioners in 5 primary care centers. Tests of internal reliability and validity included Cronbach's alpha, item total correlations and factor analysis. Seven items of the QUality Of care Through the patient's Eyes (QUOTE) questionnaire assessing 'affective performance' of the physician were included in factor analysis and used to investigate convergent validity. Results. Of the 800 distributed questionnaires, 655 (82%) were returned. Acceptability and face validity were supported by a low number of 'does not apply' responses (range 0.2%-11.9%). Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.974). Corrected item total correlations were at a minimum of 0.837. Factor analysis on the 10 items of the CARE Measure and 7 QUOTE items resulted in two factors (Eigenvalue > 1), the first containing the CARE Measure items and the second containing the QUOTE items. Convergent construct validity between the CARE Measure and QUOTE was confirmed with a modest positive correlation (r = 0.34, n = 654, P < 0.001). Conclusion. The findings support the preliminary validity and reliability of the Dutch CARE Measure. Future research is required to investigate divergent validity and discriminant ability between doctors.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], JEFF SCAL EMP
[2]   Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE Measure in a general medicine outpatient setting [J].
Aomatsu, Muneyoshi ;
Abe, Hinako ;
Abe, Keiko ;
Yasui, Hiroki ;
Suzuki, Tomio ;
Sato, Juichi ;
Ban, Nobutaro ;
Mercer, Stewert W. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 31 (01) :118-126
[3]   Comparing a Self-Administered Measure of Empathy with Observed Behavior Among Medical Students [J].
Chen, Daniel C. R. ;
Pahilan, M. Elaine ;
Orlander, Jay D. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (03) :200-202
[4]   Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study [J].
Deveugele, M ;
Derese, A ;
van den Brink-Muinen, A ;
Bensing, J ;
De Maeseneer, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7362) :472-474
[5]   Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong [J].
Fung, Colman S. C. ;
Hua, Angela ;
Tam, Lucia ;
Mercer, Stewart W. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2009, 26 (05) :398-406
[6]  
Glaser KM, 2007, MED SCI MONITOR, V13, pCR291
[7]   Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care:: an international comparison [J].
Grol, R ;
Wensing, M ;
Mainz, J ;
Ferreira, P ;
Hearnshaw, H ;
Hjortdahl, P ;
Olesen, F ;
Ribacke, M ;
Spenser, T ;
Szécsényi, J .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (01) :4-11
[8]   A systematic review of tests of empathy in medicine [J].
Hemmerdinger J.M. ;
Stoddart S.D.R. ;
Lilford R.J. .
BMC Medical Education, 7 (1)
[9]   Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction with physician, interpersonal trust, and compliance [J].
Hojat, Mohammadreza ;
Louis, Daniel Z. ;
Maxwell, Kaye ;
Markham, Fred ;
Wender, Richard ;
Gonnella, Joseph S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 1 :83-87
[10]  
JARSKI RW, 1985, J MED EDUC, V60, P545