Non-invasive stereotactic ablative boost in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

被引:8
作者
Dalwadi, Shraddha [1 ]
Echeverria, Alfredo [1 ]
Jhaveri, Pavan [1 ]
Bui, Tung [1 ]
Waheed, Nabila [2 ]
Tran, Danny [3 ]
Bonnen, Mark [4 ]
Ludwig, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Ctr Canc & Blood Disorders, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Remote Dosimetry Serv, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; radiation; brachytherapy; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; BRACHYTHERAPY; SBRT;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2019-001104
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction The current literature is insufficient to guide care for patients with cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost is a clinical necessity for these patients, but highly debated among radiation oncologists. Objective To report toxicity and survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with a non-invasive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost instead of brachytherapy Methods Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were entered, between January 2008 and December 2018, who were recommended definitive intent external boost after pelvic radiotherapy to 45-50.4 Gy concurrent with weekly cisplatin and simultaneous/sequential nodal boost up to 55-66 Gy. Simulation CT was facilitated using radio-opaque fiducials, empty rectum, dedicated bladder filling, and whole body vaculoplastic immobilization. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to report local/regional recurrences, distant metastases, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Results A total of 25 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 6-54). Patients received stereotactic ablative radiotherapy due to refusal of brachytherapy (9/25, 36%), medical co-morbidities limiting implantation (9/25, 36%), or technical infeasibility (7/25, 28%). Typical fractionation was 24-30 Gy in 4-5 fractions (24/25, 96%). The most common long-term toxicity was grade 1-2 vaginal dryness, discomfort, stenosis, and/or dyspareunia (4/25, 16%). One patient had new post-treatment grade 4 fistula in an area of previous tumor erosion (1/25, 4%). Overall survival, cancer specific survival, loco-regional control, and distant control were 95.5%, 100%, 95.5%, and 89.1%, respectively, at 2 years. Conclusion Further study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy boost for cervical cancer is needed; a brachytherapy-similar approach portends clinical success with 95.5% overall survival and loco-regional control at 2 years.
引用
收藏
页码:1684 / 1688
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy as a Boost for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer [J].
Albuquerque, Kevin ;
Tumati, Vasu ;
Lea, Jayanthi ;
Ahn, Chul ;
Richardson, Debra ;
Miller, David ;
Timmerman, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (03) :464-471
[2]   Some implications of linear-quadratic-linear radiation dose-response with regard to hypofractionation [J].
Astrahan, Melvin .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) :4161-4172
[3]   The Tumor Radiobiology of SRS and SBRT: Are More Than the 5 Rs Involved? [J].
Brown, J. Martin ;
Carlson, David J. ;
Brenner, David J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 88 (02) :254-262
[4]   Comparison of intracavitary brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy dose distribution for cervical cancer [J].
Cengiz, Mustafa ;
Dogan, Ali ;
Ozyigit, Gokhan ;
Erturk, Ertugrul ;
Yildiz, Ferah ;
Selek, Ugur ;
Ulger, Sukran ;
Colak, Fatma ;
Zorlu, Faruk .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (02) :125-129
[5]   Stereotactic body radiation therapy - A comprehensive review [J].
Chang, Brian K. ;
Timmerman, Robert D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (06) :637-644
[6]  
Den RB, 2012, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL, V83, pe371
[7]   CyberKnife boost for patients with cervical cancer unable to undergo brachytherapy [J].
Haas, Jonathan Andrew ;
Witten, Matthew R. ;
Clancey, Owen ;
Episcopia, Karen ;
Accordino, Diane ;
Chalas, Eva .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2
[8]   Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States [J].
Han, Kathy ;
Milosevic, Michael ;
Fyles, Anthony ;
Pintilie, Melania ;
Viswanathan, Akila N. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01) :111-119
[9]   Stereotactic body radiation therapy via helical tomotherapy to replace brachytherapy for brachytherapy-unsuitable cervical cancer patients - a preliminary result [J].
Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ;
Tien, Hui-Ju ;
Hsiao, Sheng-Mou ;
Wei, Ming-Chow ;
Wu, Wen-Yih ;
Sun, Hsu-Dong ;
Wang, Li-Ying ;
Hsieh, Yen-Ping ;
Chen, Yu-Jen ;
Shueng, Pei-Wei .
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2013, 6 :59-66
[10]   The experiences of women receiving brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic literature review [J].
Humphrey, P. ;
Bennett, C. ;
Cramp, F. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2018, 24 (04) :396-403