Randomised phase II study of docetaxel plus vandetanib versus docetaxel followed by vandetanib in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: SWOG S0904

被引:27
|
作者
Coleman, Robert L. [1 ]
Moon, James [2 ]
Sood, Anil K. [1 ]
Hu, Wei [1 ]
Delmore, James E. [3 ]
Bonebrake, Albert J. [4 ]
Anderson, Garnet L. [2 ,5 ]
Chambers, Setsuko K. [6 ]
Markman, Maurie [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] SWOG Stat Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Wichita CCOP, Associates Womens Hlth, Wichita, KS USA
[4] Canc Res Ozarks Cox Hlth, Springfield, MO USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] Arizona Canc Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[7] Canc Treatment Centers Amer, Zion, IL USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Primary peritoneal cancer; Fallopian tube cancer; Epithelial cancer; Chemotherapy; Taxanes; Vandetanib; Clinical trial; Randomised phase II; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; RESISTANT OVARIAN; IN-VIVO; CANCER; ANGIOGENESIS; THERAPY; PLACEBO; ZD6474; CELL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Vandetanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/3, EGFR and RET, which has demonstrated clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with taxanes. We explored the efficacy, safety and toxicity of docetaxel and vandetanib in women with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: Women with refractory or progressive OC were randomised 1: 1 to docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), IV) + vandetanib (100 mg daily, PO, D + V) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), D). Up to three additional cytotoxic regimens for recurrence and prior anti-angiogenic agents (as primary therapy) were allowed. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS). The study had 84% power to detect a PFS hazard ratio of 0.65, using a one-sided P of 0.1. This corresponds to an increase in median PFS from 3.6 months to 5.6 months. Patients progressing on D were allowed to receive single agent vandetanib (D -> V). Results: 131 Patients were enrolled; two were excluded. 16% had received prior anti-angiogenic therapy. The median PFS estimates were 3.0 mos (D + V) versus 3.5 (D); HR: 0.99 (80% CI: 0.79-1.26). 61 Patients on D + V were assessable for toxicity; 20(33%) had treatment- related Grade (G) 4 events, primarily haematologic. Similarly, 17 (27%) of 64 patients receiving D had G4 events, primarily haematologic. 27 Evaluable patients crossed-over to V. 1/27(4%) experienced a G4 event. G3 diarrhoea was observed in 4% D ! V patients. Median OS was 14 mos (D + V) versus 18 mos (D -> V); HR(OS): 1.25 (80% CI: 0.931.68). Crossover vandetanib response was 4% (1/27 evaluable patients). High plasma IL-8 levels were associated with response to D + V. Conclusions: Combination docetaxel + vandetanib did not prolong PFS relative to docetaxel alone in OC patients. No unexpected safety issues were identified. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1638 / 1648
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Phase 1-2 study of docetaxel plus aflibercept in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Duska, Linda R.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Heymach, John V.
    Kamat, Aparna A.
    Modesitt, Susan C.
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Iyer, Revathy B.
    Garcia, Michael E.
    Miller, Debbie L.
    Jackson, Edward F.
    Ng, Chaan S.
    Kundra, Vikas
    Jaffe, Robert
    Sood, Anil K.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (12) : 1109 - 1117
  • [2] A randomized phase II evaluation of weekly gemcitabine plus pazopanib versus weekly gemcitabine alone in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma
    Duska, L. R.
    Petroni, G. R.
    Varhegyi, N.
    Brown, J.
    Jelovac, D.
    Moore, K. N.
    McGuire, W. P.
    Darus, C.
    Barroilhet, L. M.
    Secord, A. A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (03) : 585 - 592
  • [3] Phase II study of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer
    Hagemann, Andrea R.
    Novetsky, Akiva P.
    Zighelboim, Israel
    Gao, Feng
    Massad, L. Stewart
    Thaker, Premal H.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Mutch, David G.
    Wright, Jason D.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) : 535 - 540
  • [4] A phase II study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma
    Penson, Richard T.
    Moore, Kathleen M.
    Fleming, Gini F.
    Braly, Patricia
    Schimp, Veronica
    Nguyen, Hoa
    Matulonis, Ursula A.
    Banerjee, Susana
    Haluska, Paul
    Gore, Martin
    Bodurka, Diane C.
    Hozak, Rebecca R.
    Joshi, Adarsh
    Xu, Yihuan
    Schwartz, Jonathan D.
    McGuire, William P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 134 (03) : 478 - 485
  • [5] A phase II evaluation of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Martin, Lainie P.
    Sill, Michael
    Shahin, Mark S.
    Powell, Matthew
    DiSilvestro, Paul
    Landrum, Lisa M.
    Gaillard, Stephanie L.
    Goodheart, Michael J.
    Hoffman, James
    Schilder, Russell J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (03) : 526 - 530
  • [6] A phase II study of a urokinase-derived peptide (A6) in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Gold, Michael A.
    Brady, William E.
    Lankes, Heather A.
    Rose, Peter G.
    Kelley, Joseph L.
    De Geest, Koen
    Crispens, Marta A.
    Resnick, Kimberly E.
    Howell, Stephen B.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (03) : 635 - 639
  • [7] Randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab plus everolimus versus bevacizumab alone for recurrent or persistent ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal carcinoma: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study
    Tew, William P.
    Sill, Michael W.
    Walker, Joan L.
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Bonebrake, Albert J.
    Schilder, Jeanne M.
    Stuckey, Ashley
    Rice, Laurel
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Aghajanian, Carol A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 151 (02) : 257 - 263
  • [8] A phase II study of sunitinib in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: an NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study
    Biagi, J. J.
    Oza, A. M.
    ChalChal, H. I.
    Grimshaw, R.
    Ellard, S. L.
    Lee, U.
    Hirte, H.
    Sederias, J.
    Ivy, S. P.
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (02) : 335 - 340
  • [9] A phase II evaluation of belinostat and carboplatin in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study
    Dizon, Don S.
    Blessing, John A.
    Penson, Richard T.
    Drake, Richard D.
    Walker, Joan L.
    Johnston, Carolyn M.
    DiSilvestro, Paul A.
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (02) : 367 - 371
  • [10] A randomized phase II study of cabozantinib versus weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Matulonis, Ursula A.
    Sill, Michael W.
    Makker, Vicky
    Mutch, David G.
    Carlson, Jay W.
    Darus, Christopher J.
    Mannel, Robert S.
    Bender, David P.
    Crane, Erin K.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 152 (03) : 548 - 553