Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in the United States A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

被引:60
|
作者
Sun, Enid Y. [1 ]
Jadotte, Yuri T. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Halperin, William [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Newark Campus, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Nursing, Newark Campus, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers State Univ, Northeast Inst Evidence Synth & Translat, Sch Nursing, Newark, NJ USA
[6] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Family Populat & Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
cardiac rehabilitation; disparities; meta-analysis; systematic review; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HEART-DISEASE; AMERICAN-ASSOCIATION; SECONDARY PREVENTION; ENROLLMENT; PREDICTORS; PATIENT; PROGRAMS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1097/HCR.0000000000000203
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a class I recommendation for all patients following an acute cardiac event or cardiac surgery according to the The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Studies have shown that there are differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation rates between sociodemographic groups. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to synthesize quantitative data on the relationship between outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (OCR) attendance and various sociodemographic factors. METHODS: We conducted a search of PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Dissertations & Theses A&I, and conference abstracts for observational studies conducted in the United States that fit our inclusion criteria. A total of 21 studies were included in our final review and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Our meta-analyses showed that overall, attenders were younger than nonattenders (mean difference = -3.74 years, 95% CI = -5.87 to -1.61) and the odds of participation were lower among females (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.51-0.69), individuals with a high school degree or less (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.91), and the uninsured or self-payers (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.14-0.71). Full-or part-time employees were more likely to participate than those not employed (OR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.08-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analyses showed that there are significant sociodemographic disparities in CR participation. On the basis of this knowledge, clinicians and policy makers should focus on identifying and eliminating barriers to participation.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 10
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Medium-term effects of cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: systematic review and meta-analysis of results from national and international trials
    Mittag, Oskar
    Schramm, Susanne
    Boehmen, Stephan
    Hueppe, Angelika
    Meyer, Thorsten
    Raspe, Heiner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2011, 18 (04): : 587 - 593
  • [22] Interventions to Promote Patient Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pio, Carolina Santiago de Araujo
    Chaves, Gabriela
    Davies, Philippa
    Taylor, Rod
    Grace, Sherry
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02)
  • [23] Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on metabolic syndrome and its components: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadeghi, Masoumeh
    Salehi-Abargouei, Amin
    Kasaei, Zahra
    Sajjadieh-Khajooie, Hamidreza
    Heidari, Ramin
    Roohafza, Hamidreza
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 21
  • [24] Effect of stress management training in cardiac rehabilitation among coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Yan
    Lan, Jing
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04) : 1491 - 1501
  • [25] Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness in cardiac rehabilitation patients: A meta-analysis
    Sandercock, Gavin
    Hurtado, Valentina
    Cardoso, Fernando
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 167 (03) : 894 - 902
  • [26] Cardiac Rehabilitation in the United States
    Menezes, Arthur R.
    Lavie, Carl J.
    Milani, Richard V.
    Forman, Daniel E.
    King, Marjorie
    Williams, Mark A.
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 56 (05) : 522 - 529
  • [27] The effectiveness of digital health interventions for the maintenance of physical activity following cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luijk, Alexander
    Mortensen, Sofie Rath
    Hamborg, Trine Gronbek
    Zangger, Graziella
    Ahler, Jonas Risum
    Christensen, Jan
    Skou, Soren T.
    Tang, Lars Hermann
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [28] Cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dibben, Grace Olivia
    Dalal, Hasnain M.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Doherty, Patrick
    Tang, Lars Hermann
    Hillsdon, Melvyn
    HEART, 2018, 104 (17) : 1394 - 1402
  • [29] Effect of cardiac rehabilitation training on patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jingjun
    Li, Yongchun
    Gong, Fengying
    Huang, Ronglv
    Zhang, Qiang
    Liu, Zhaoru
    Lin, Jintao
    Li, Aiwu
    Lv, Ying
    Cheng, Yunshui
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (11) : 11901 - 11909
  • [30] Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rawstorn, Jonathan C.
    Gant, Nicholas
    Direito, Artur
    Beckmann, Christina
    Maddison, Ralph
    HEART, 2016, 102 (15) : 1183 - 1192