Utility of Intraoperative Monitoring in the Resection of Spinal Cord Tumors

被引:33
|
作者
Lakomkin, Nikita [1 ]
Mistry, Akshitkumar M. [2 ]
Zuckerman, Scott L. [2 ]
Ladner, Travis [1 ]
Kothari, Parth [1 ]
Lee, Nathan J. [1 ]
Stannard, Blaine [2 ]
Vasquez, Raul A. [3 ]
Cheng, Joseph S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Neurosurg, 1 Gustave Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Neurosurg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Neurosurg, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
intramedullary; intraoperative neuromonitoring; motor-evoked potentials; somatosensory evoked potentials; transcranial motor evoked potentials; MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL DATA; CONSECUTIVE PROCEDURES; SURGERY CORRELATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002300
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective review of institutional data. Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the resection of spine tumors and evaluate the ability of both single and multi-modal monitoring to predict postoperative neurological deficits. Summary of Background Data. Although the utility of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is well established in scoliosis and degenerative surgery, studies in spine tumor patients have been limited. Methods. A series of consecutive patients who underwent resection with the use of 10M at a single institution between August 2009 and March 2013 was identified. Demographic, clinical, and neuromonitoring data were collected preoperatively, during surgery, at the moment of discharge, and at a 6-month follow-up visit. Three cohorts were established based on the anatomical location of the tumor: intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and extradural. Additional groupings were formed based on spinal region. Patients with significant changes in SSEPs or MEPs during surgery were identified and the rate of neurological deficits was assessed. Results. A total of 52 patients were analyzed. A change in SSEPs or MEPs was detected in 11 (21.2%) cases whereas 14 patients (26.9%) developed permanent postoperative deficits.SSEPs predicted deficits in the resection of intramedullary tumors (P=0.015) (area under cover, AUC= 0.83), and intradural extramedullary tumors (P=0.048; AUC = 0.70). MEP monitoring did not predict postoperative deficits in the resection of intramedullary (P=0.21; AUC = 0.69) or intradural extramedullary tumors (P=0.31; AUC= 0.63). Neither SSEPs nor MEPs predicted deficits for extradural tumors. Conclusion. The efficacy of 10M in spine tumor resection is dependent on tumor location relative to the spinal cord and dura. The accuracy of SSEPs and their ability to predict postoperative deficits was greatest for intramedullary lesions. For this series, MEP and multi-modal monitoring did not confer a benefit in predicting permanent neurological deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery
    Kothbauer, K. F.
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 37 (06): : 407 - 414
  • [32] Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery
    Jin, Seung-Hyun
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Choi, Young Doo
    Kwak, Gilho
    Kim, Bo Eun
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (12) : 2149 - 2155
  • [33] Intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: can we do it without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring?
    Hsu, Wesley
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    Jallo, George I.
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2010, 26 (02) : 241 - 245
  • [34] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery
    Jong-Hwa Park
    Seung-Jae Hyun
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2015, (09) : 765 - 773
  • [35] Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery-Importance of Continuous Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring After Tumor Resection
    Forster, Marie-Therese
    Marquardt, Gerhard
    Seifert, Volker
    Szelenyi, Andrea
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (16) : E1001 - E1008
  • [36] Electrophysiological testing in spinal cord tumors
    Andre-Obadia, N.
    Mauguiere, F.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2017, 63 (05) : 356 - 365
  • [37] Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: utility and anesthetic implications
    Gunter, Ashley
    Ruskin, Keith J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (05) : 539 - 543
  • [38] Evaluation of a Combination of Waveform Amplitude and Peak Latency in Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring
    Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
    Ando, Kei
    Shinjo, Ryuichi
    Ito, Kenyu
    Tsushima, Mikito
    Morozumi, Masayoshi
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Machino, Masaaki
    Ota, Kyotaro
    Ishiguro, Naoki
    Imagama, Shiro
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (17) : 1231 - 1237
  • [39] Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons
    Peeling, Lissa
    Hentschel, Stephen
    Fox, Richard
    Hall, Hamilton
    Fourney, Daryl R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 53 (05) : 324 - 328
  • [40] Role of multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during embolisation of a spinal cord arteriovenous malformation - A paradigmatic case
    Sala, F
    Niimi, Y
    Berenstein, A
    Deletis, V
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2000, 6 (03): : 223 - 234