Exploring Validated Self-Reported Instruments to Assess Adherence to Medications Used: A Review Comparing Existing Instruments

被引:11
|
作者
Nassar, Razan Izzat [1 ]
Basheti, Iman Amin [1 ]
Saini, Bandana [2 ]
机构
[1] Appl Sci Private Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Clin Pharm & Therapeut, POB 166, Amman 11931, Jordan
[2] Univ Sydney, Coll Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
adherence to medications; compliance; questionnaire; self-report; scale; survey; instrument; LOW-LITERACY PATIENTS; PATIENT ADHERENCE; REPORT SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; NONADHERENCE; HYPERTENSION; RELIABILITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S352161
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To provide an overview of instruments that measure adherence to medications to facilitate selection of an instrument and to provide a summary of some published adherence assessment tools tailored to be used by the healthcare team, especially the pharmacists. Data Sources: Studies were identified via PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar using the search terms medication adherence, compliance, persistence, combined with the terms questionnaire, scale, survey, self-report, and instrument. Study Selection: Articles written in English, describing questionnaire instruments that were psychometrically evaluated (reporting a good coefficient of internal consistency, reliability assessed through Cronbach's alpha, and had been validated against a subjective or objective measure), and containing 30 or fewer items were included. Data Synthesis: Twelve instruments were identified and included in this review. Instruments were reviewed by evaluating specific characteristics (number of items, sample size, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, questionnaire completion time, criterion validity, and component analysis). Conclusion: Various instruments are used to assess patient adherence to medications; however, no single one performs well on all criteria. Every instrument has different advantages and unique properties. A particular instrument can be chosen after considering certain factors, such as the specific requirements, population, the needed time to complete the questionnaire, the sensitivity, and the specificity of the questionnaire. Moreover, there is a recognized need to provide primary care medication adherence services customized to patient's needs. A link for teamwork between healthcare providers such as pharmacists and patients is needed. This link can be a validated instrument to assess patient's adherence to medication.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 513
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments
    Lee, Eun-Hyun
    Kang, Eun Hee
    Kang, Hyun-Jung
    ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (05) : 267 - 276
  • [2] Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: A systematic review of self-reported instruments
    Boyer, L.
    Baumstarck-Barrau, K.
    Cano, N.
    Zendjidjian, X.
    Belzeaux, R.
    Limousin, S.
    Magalon, D.
    Samuelian, J. -C.
    Lancon, C.
    Auquier, P.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 24 (08) : 540 - 549
  • [3] Current Conceptualization and Operationalization of Adolescents' Social Capital: A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Instruments
    Ahlborg, Mikael G.
    Nyholm, Maria
    Nygren, Jens M.
    Svedberg, Petra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [4] Systematic psychometric review of self-reported instruments to assess patient safety culture in primary care
    Desmedt, Melissa
    Bergs, Jochen
    Vertriest, Sonja
    Vlayen, Annemie
    Schrooten, Ward
    Hellings, Johan
    Vandijck, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (03) : 539 - 549
  • [5] A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle
    Martin, Robroy L.
    Irrgang, James J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 37 (02) : 72 - 84
  • [6] Self-reported medication adherence instruments and their applicability in low-middle income countries: a scoping review
    Khoiry, Qisty A. A.
    Alfian, Sofa D. D.
    van Boven, Job F. M.
    Abdulah, Rizky
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [7] Systematic review of measurement properties of self-reported instruments for evaluating self-care in adults
    Matarese, Maria
    Lommi, Marzia
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (06) : 1272 - 1287
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome instruments that evaluate adherence behaviours in adults with asthma: a systematic review of measurement properties
    Gagne, Myriam
    Boulet, Louis-Philippe
    Perez, Norma
    Moisan, Jocelyne
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (09) : 1928 - 1940
  • [9] Quality appraisal of generic self-reported instruments measuring health-related productivity changes: a systematic review
    Noben, Cindy Y. G.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    Nijhuis, Frans J.
    de Rijk, Angelique E.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [10] Self-reported painful joint count and assessor-reported tender joint count as instruments to assess pain in hand osteoarthritis
    Kroon, Feline P. B.
    Damman, Wendy
    van der Plas, Johan L.
    van Beest, Sjoerd
    Rosendaal, Frits R.
    van der Heijde, Desiree
    Kloppenburg, Margreet
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 59 (05) : 1094 - 1098