Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Short Form (CAAS-SF): Construction and Validation

被引:124
作者
Maggiori, Christian [1 ]
Rossier, Jerome [1 ,2 ]
Savickas, Mark L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Natl Ctr Competence Res LIVES, Batiment Geopolis 5793, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Inst Psychol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Northeastern Ohio Univ Coll Med, Dept Behav & Community Hlth Sci, Rootstown, OH USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
career adaptability; CAAS; short format; scale validation; confirmatory factor analyses; measurement equivalence; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE; TESTING MEASUREMENT; SELF-EFFICACY; FIT INDEXES; ADAPTABILITY; VALUES; VERSION; LIFE;
D O I
10.1177/1069072714565856
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS) has become one of the most widely used questionnaires to assess career adaptability. To facilitate its integration into large surveys, in varied settings, the aim of this article was to develop a brief 12-item version, the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Short Form (CAAS-SF). A sample of 2,800 French- and German-speaking adults living in Switzerland completed the CAAS. On a first random subsample, a principal component analyses conducted on the CAAS-SF suggested a four-factor solution. A one-to-one association was found between these components and the subscales of the CAAS-SF. Confirmatory factor analyses, conducted on a second random subsample, confirmed the hierarchical factor structure of this short version. Based on Cheung and Rensvold's criteria, the CAAS-SF reached measurement equivalence across linguistic and gender groups. Furthermore, the 12- and 24-item versions were strongly associated. The results supported the CAAS-SF as pertinent and economical alternative to the 24-item version.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 325
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
[Anonymous], AMOS VERSION 19 0 CO
[3]  
Baruch Y., 2010, APA HDB IND ORG PSYC, V2, P67, DOI DOI 10.1037/12170-003
[4]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[5]  
Byrne B.M., 1998, Multivariate applications book series. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications
[6]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[7]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[8]   Bringing values back in - The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries [J].
Davidov, Eldad ;
Schmidt, Peter ;
Schwartz, Shalom H. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (03) :420-445
[9]   The relations of employability skills to career adaptability among technical school students [J].
de Guzman, Allan B. ;
Choi, Kyoung Ok .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 82 (03) :199-207
[10]  
DeBruin G.P., 2005, South African Journal of Psychology, V35, P748, DOI [DOI 10.1177/008124630503500408, 10.1177%2F008124630503500408]