Refining Prediction in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of Machine Learning Analyses in the TRD III Sample

被引:57
作者
Kautzky, Alexander [1 ]
Dold, Markus [1 ]
Bartova, Lucie [1 ]
Spies, Marie [1 ]
Vanicek, Thomas [1 ]
Souery, Daniel [2 ,3 ]
Montgomery, Stuart [4 ]
Mendlewicz, Julien [5 ]
Zohar, Joseph [6 ]
Fabbri, Chiara [7 ]
Serretti, Alessandro [7 ]
Lanzenberger, Rupert [1 ]
Kasper, Siegfried [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Psy Pluriel Ctr Europeen Psychol Med, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ London, Imperial Coll, London, England
[5] Free Univ Brussels, Sch Med, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Div Psychiat, Ramat Gan, Israel
[7] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
关键词
SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS; MAJOR DEPRESSION; EUROPEAN MULTICENTER; RATING-SCALE; OPEN-LABEL; STRATEGIES; SYMPTOMS; NONRESPONDERS; IMPROVEMENT; DULOXETINE;
D O I
10.4088/JCP.16m11385
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The study objective was to generate a prediction model for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) using machine learning featuring a large set of 47 clinical and sociodemographic predictors of treatment outcome. Method: 552 Patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) according to DSM-IV criteria were enrolled between 2011 and 2016. TRD was defined as failure to reach response to antidepressant treatment, characterized by a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score below 22 after at least 2 antidepressant trials of adequate length and dosage were administered. RandomForest (RF) was used for predicting treatment outcome phenotypes in a 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The full model with 47 predictors yielded an accuracy of 75.0%. When the number of predictors was reduced to 15, accuracies between 67.6% and 71.0% were attained for different test sets. The most informative predictors of treatment outcome were baseline MADRS score for the current episode; impairment of family, social, and work life; the timespan between first and last depressive episode; severity; suicidal risk; age; body mass index; and the number of lifetime depressive episodes as well as lifetime duration of hospitalization. Conclusions: With the application of the machine learning algorithm RF, an efficient prediction model with an accuracy of 75.0% for forecasting treatment outcome could be generated, thus surpassing the predictive capabilities of clinical evaluation. We also supply a simplified algorithm of 15 easily collected clinical and sociodemographic predictors that can be obtained within approximately 10 minutes, which reached an accuracy of 70.6%. Thus, we are confident that our model will be validated within other samples to advance an accurate prediction model fit for clinical usage in TRD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of treatment resistant depression: A prospective European multicenter study
    Balestri, Martina
    Calati, Raffaella
    Souery, Daniel
    Kautzky, Alexander
    Kasper, Siegfried
    Montgomery, Stuart
    Zohar, Joseph
    Mendlewicz, Julien
    Serretti, Alessandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 189 : 224 - 232
  • [2] The early improvement of depressive symptoms as a potential predictor of response to antidepressants in depressive patients who failed to respond to previous antidepressant treatments. Analysis of naturalistic data
    Bares, M.
    Novak, T.
    Kopecek, M.
    Stopkova, P.
    Kozeny, J.
    Hoeschl, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27 (07) : 522 - 527
  • [3] Efficacy of Bupropion XR in Treatment-Resistant Elderly Patients: A Case Series Study
    Bergman, Joseph
    Miodownik, Chanoch
    Palatnik, Alex
    Lerner, Vladimir
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 34 (01) : 17 - 20
  • [4] Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: A review of current concepts and methods
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Turecki, Gustavo
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2007, 52 (01): : 46 - 54
  • [5] Exploiting SNP Correlations within Random Forest for Genome-Wide Association Studies
    Botta, Vincent
    Louppe, Gilles
    Geurts, Pierre
    Wehenkel, Louis
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [6] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [7] The Integrative Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Comprehensive Review and Perspectives
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Berk, Michael
    Hyphantis, Thomas N.
    McIntyre, Roger S.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2014, 83 (02) : 70 - 88
  • [8] Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach
    Chekroud, Adam Mourad
    Zotti, Ryan Joseph
    Shehzad, Zarrar
    Gueorguieva, Ralitza
    Johnson, Marcia K.
    Trivedi, Madhukar H.
    Cannon, Tyrone D.
    Krystal, John Harrison
    Corlett, Philip Robert
    [J]. LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 3 (03): : 243 - 250
  • [9] Methods for Identifying SNP Interactions: A Review on Variations of Logic Regression, Random Forest and Bayesian Logistic Regression
    Chen, Carla Chia-Ming
    Schwender, Holger
    Keith, Jonathan
    Nunkesser, Robin
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    Macrossan, Paula
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 8 (06) : 1580 - 1591
  • [10] De Berardis D, SCI WORLD