Untethering the TIR1 auxin receptor from the SCF complex increases its stability and inhibits auxin response

被引:82
作者
Yu, Hong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Moss, Britney L. [3 ]
Bargmann, Bastiaan O. R. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Renhou [1 ,2 ]
Prigge, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Nemhauser, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Estelle, Mark [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Howard Hughes Med Inst, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Sect Cell & Dev Biol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
F-BOX PROTEINS; DEGRADATION; PERCEPTION; EXPRESSION; RESISTANCE; MUTATIONS; ETHYLENE; MUTANTS; SUBUNIT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1038/NPLANTS.2014.30
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Plant genomes encode large numbers of F-box proteins (FBPs), the substrate recognition subunit of SKP1-CULLIN-F-box (SCF) ubiquitin ligases. There are similar to 700 FBPs in Arabidopsis, most of which are uncharacterized. TIR1 is among the best-studied plant FBPs and functions as a receptor for the plant hormone auxin. Here we use a yeast two-hybrid system to identify novel TIR1 mutants with altered properties. The analysis of these mutants reveals that TIR1 associates with the CULLIN1 (CUL1) subunit of the SCF through the N-terminal H1 helix of the F-box domain. Mutations that untether TIR1 from CUL1 stabilize the FBP and cause auxin resistance and associated growth defects, probably by protecting TIR1 substrates from degradation. Based on these results we propose that TIR1 is subject to autocatalytic degradation when assembled into an SCF. Further, our results suggest a general method for determining the physiological function of uncharacterized FBPs. Finally, we show that a key amino acid variation in the F-box domain of auxin signalling F-box (AFB1), a closely related FBP, reduces its ability to form an SCF, resulting in an increase in AFB1 levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Positive Fluorescent Selection Permits Precise, Rapid, and In-Depth Overexpression Analysis in Plant Protoplasts
    Bargmann, Bastiaan O. R.
    Birnbaum, Kenneth D.
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 149 (03) : 1231 - 1239
  • [2] Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases: global regulation and activation cycles
    Bosu, Dimple R.
    Kipreos, Edward T.
    [J]. CELL DIVISION, 2008, 3 (1)
  • [3] Villalobos LIAC, 2012, NAT CHEM BIOL, V8, P477, DOI [10.1038/NCHEMBIO.926, 10.1038/nchembio.926]
  • [4] RING Domain E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
    Deshaies, Raymond J.
    Joazeiro, Claudio A. P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 78 : 399 - 434
  • [5] Plant development is regulated by a family of auxin receptor F box proteins
    Dharmasiri, N
    Dharmasiri, S
    Weijers, D
    Lechner, E
    Yamada, M
    Hobbie, L
    Ehrismann, JS
    Jürgens, G
    Estelle, M
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL CELL, 2005, 9 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [6] The F-box subunit of the SCF E3 complex is encoded by a diverse superfamily of genes in Arabidopsis
    Gagne, JM
    Downes, BP
    Shiu, SH
    Durski, AM
    Vierstra, RD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 (17) : 11519 - 11524
  • [7] Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of multiple F-box proteins by an autocatalytic mechanism
    Galan, JM
    Peter, M
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (16) : 9124 - 9129
  • [8] RETRACTED: The AFB4 Auxin Receptor Is a Negative Regulator of Auxin Signaling in Seedlings (Retracted article. See vol. 25, pg. 819, 2015)
    Greenham, Katie
    Santner, Aaron
    Castillejo, Cristina
    Mooney, Sutton
    Sairanen, IIkka
    Ljung, Karin
    Estelle, Mark
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 520 - 525
  • [9] A Synthetic Approach Reveals Extensive Tunability of Auxin Signaling
    Havens, Kyle A.
    Guseman, Jessica M.
    Jang, Seunghee S.
    Pierre-Jerome, Edith
    Bolten, Nick
    Klavins, Eric
    Nemhauser, Jennifer L.
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 160 (01) : 135 - 142
  • [10] The Cullin-RING Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
    Hua, Zhihua
    Vierstra, Richard D.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, VOL 62, 2011, 62 : 299 - 334