A comparison of two models to predict soil moisture from remote sensing data of RADARSAT II

被引:13
|
作者
Al-Bakri, Jawad [1 ]
Suleiman, Ayman [1 ]
Berg, Aaron [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Agr, Dept Land Water & Environm, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Geog, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Remote sensing; SAR; GIS; Soil moisture; Jordan; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-013-1115-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study investigates the performance of empirical and semiempirical models to predict soil moisture from the data of RADARSAT II synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for the Yarmouk basin in Jordan. Data of SAR were obtained forMay and June 2010 and were processed to obtain backscatter (sigma(o)) data for the study area. Results showed significant correlations between soil moisture content (m(v)) and horizontally polarized sigma(o), with coefficient of determination (R-2) of 0.64. The root mean square error for the SAR volumetric soil moisture content was 0.09 and 0.06 m(3)/m(3) for the empirical and semiempirical regression models, respectively. Both models had different clustering patterns in the soil moisture maps in the study area. The spatial agreement between maps of soil moisture was in the range of 55 to 65 % when the maps were reclassified based on intervals of 5 % mv for both models. In terms of soil moisture interval, both models showed that most of soil moisture changes between the two images (dates) were in the range of +/- 5 %. Some high differences in.mv were observed between the two models. These were mainly attributed to the non-inverted pixels in the soil moisture maps produced by the semiempirical model. Therefore, this model may be applied for a limited range of soil moisture prediction. The use of regression model could predict a wider range for soil moisture when compared with the semiempirical model. However, more work might be needed to improve the empirical model before scaling it up to the whole study area.
引用
收藏
页码:4851 / 4860
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Applicability evaluation of soil moisture constraint algorithms in remote sensing evapotranspiration models
    Bai, Peng
    Cai, Changxin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 623
  • [42] Monitoring Live Fuel Moisture Using Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing Proxies
    Yi Qi
    Philip E. Dennison
    Jessica Spencer
    David Riaño
    Fire Ecology, 2012, 8 : 71 - 87
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Machine-Learning Models for Soil Moisture Estimation Using High-Resolution Remote-Sensing Data
    Li, Ming
    Yan, Yueguan
    LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [44] To Study the Volumetric Soil Moisture Through Microwave Remote Sensing
    Phonphan, Walaiporn
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (07) : 5351 - 5354
  • [45] Regional estimation of soil moisture using remote sensing.
    Boisvert, JB
    Crevier, Y
    Pultz, TJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 76 (03) : 325 - 334
  • [46] SOIL MOISTURE PREDICTION WITH MULTISPECTRAL VISIBLE AND NIR REMOTE SENSING
    McGuirk, Savannah L.
    Cairns, Iver H.
    XXIV ISPRS CONGRESS: IMAGING TODAY, FORESEEING TOMORROW, COMMISSION III, 2022, 5-3 : 447 - 453
  • [47] Use of passive microwave remote sensing to monitor soil moisture
    Wigneron, JP
    Schmugge, T
    Chanzy, A
    Calvet, JC
    Kerr, Y
    AGRONOMIE, 1998, 18 (01): : 27 - 43
  • [48] The need for regular remote sensing observations of global soil moisture
    Owe, M
    De Jeu, RAM
    SPATIAL METHODS FOR SOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC PROBLEMS-SCIENCE, POLICY, AND STANDARDIZATION, 2003, 1420 : 92 - 106
  • [49] Soil moisture retrieval from remote sensing measurements: Current knowledge and directions for the future
    Li, Zhao-Liang
    Leng, Pei
    Zhou, Chenghu
    Chen, Kun-Shan
    Zhou, Fang-Cheng
    Shang, Guo-Fei
    EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2021, 218
  • [50] Estimating the spatial distribution of soil moisture based on Bayesian maximum entropy method with auxiliary data from remote sensing
    Gao, Shengguo
    Zhu, Zhongli
    Liu, Shaomin
    Jin, Rui
    Yang, Guangchao
    Tan, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2014, 32 : 54 - 66