Minimum important difference of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS in fibrotic interstitial lung disease

被引:38
|
作者
Tsai, Amy Po Yu [1 ]
Hur, Seo Am [1 ]
Wong, Alyson [1 ,2 ]
Safavi, Mohsen [3 ]
Assayag, Deborah [4 ]
Johannson, Kerri A. [5 ]
Morisset, Julie [6 ]
Fell, Charlene [5 ]
Fisher, Jolene H. [7 ]
Manganas, Helene [6 ]
Shapera, Shane [7 ]
Cox, Gerard [8 ]
Gershon, Andrea S. [7 ,9 ,10 ]
Hambly, Nathan [8 ]
Khalil, Nasreen [1 ]
To, Teresa [10 ,11 ]
Wilcox, Pearce George [1 ]
Halayko, Andrew [12 ,13 ]
Kolb, Martin R. J. [8 ]
Ryerson, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada
[2] St Pauls Hosp, Ctr Heart Lung Innovat, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Collaborat Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Resp Evaluat Sci Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Firestone Inst Resp Hlth, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[12] Univ Manitoba, Dept Internal Med, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[13] Univ Manitoba, Dept Physiol & Pathophysiol, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
interstitial fibrosis; health economist; IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY-FIBROSIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; FORCED VITAL CAPACITY; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; UCSD SHORTNESS; VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214944
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale The European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a multidimensional patient-reported questionnaire that supports calculation of quality-adjusted life-years. Our objectives were to demonstrate feasibility of use and to calculate the minimum important difference (MID) of the EQ-5D-5L and its associated visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods Patients who completed the EQ-5D-5L were identified from the prospective multicentre CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Validity, internal consistency and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L were assessed, followed by calculation of the MID for the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. Anchor-based methods used an unadjusted linear regression against pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and dyspnoea and other quality of life questionnaires. Distribution-based method used one-half SD and SE measurement (SEM) calculations. Results 1816 patients were analysed, including 472 (26%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. EQ-5D-5L scores were strongly correlated with the dyspnoea and other quality of life questionnaires and weakly associated with PFTs. The estimated MID for EQ-5D-5L ranged from 0.0050 to 0.054 and from 0.078 to 0.095 for the anchor-based and distribution-based methods, respectively. The MID for EQ-VAS ranged from 0.5 to 5.0 and from 8.0 to 9.7 for the anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Findings were similar across ILD subtypes, sex and age. Conclusion We used a large and diverse cohort of patients with a variety of fibrotic ILD subtypes to suggest validity and MID of both the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS. These findings will assist in designing future clinical trials and supporting cost-effectiveness analyses of potential treatments for patients with fibrotic ILD.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Normative profile of the EQ-5D-5L dimensions, EQ-5D-5L index and EQ-VAS scores for the general Thai population
    Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2489 - 2502
  • [3] Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients
    Golicki, Dominik
    Niewada, Maciej
    Karlinska, Anna
    Buczek, Julia
    Kobayashi, Adam
    Janssen, M. F.
    Pickard, A. Simon
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (06) : 1555 - 1563
  • [4] A scoping review of the use of minimally important difference of EQ-5D utility index and EQ-VAS scores in health technology assessment
    Shaw, Caroline
    Longworth, Louise
    Bennett, Bryan
    McEntee-Richardson, Louise
    Shaw, James W.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [5] Estimating a Minimal Important Difference for the EQ-5D-5L Utility Index in Dialysis Patients
    Siriwardana, Amanda N.
    Hoffman, Anna T.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    Smyth, Brendan
    Brown, Mark A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (04) : 469 - 477
  • [6] The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference
    Nolan, Claire M.
    Longworth, Louise
    Lord, Joanne
    Canavan, Jane L.
    Jones, Sarah E.
    Kon, Samantha S. C.
    Man, William D-C
    THORAX, 2016, 71 (06) : 493 - 500
  • [7] Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets
    van Hout, Ben
    Janssen, M. F.
    Feng, You-Shan
    Kohlmann, Thomas
    Busschbach, Jan
    Golicki, Dominik
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Scalone, Luciana
    Kind, Paul
    Pickard, A. Simon
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (05) : 708 - 715
  • [8] EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms
    Golicki, Dominik
    Niewada, Maciej
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 13 (01) : 191 - 200
  • [9] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the EQ-5D-5L in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a longitudinal study
    Hu, Xin
    Jing, Mingxia
    Zhang, Mei
    Yang, Ping
    Yan, Xiaolong
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [10] Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke
    Golicki, Dominik
    Niewada, Maciej
    Buczek, Julia
    Karlinska, Anna
    Kobayashi, Adam
    Janssen, M. F.
    Pickard, A. Simon
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (04) : 845 - 850