Sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation reduces the risk of anatomical recurrence in pelvic organ prolapse

被引:6
|
作者
Chou, Yu-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chuang, Fei-Chi [1 ,2 ]
Kung, Fu-Tsai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Tsai-Hwa [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Ling-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Kuan-Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 123 Ta Pei Rd, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Xiamen Chang Gung Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
concomitant hysterectomy; native tissue repair; pelvic organ prolapse; sacrospinous ligament fixation; uterine preservation; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; HYSTEROPEXY; WOMEN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/luts.12361
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study investigated the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and whether uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate. Methods The medical records of 82 patients who received SSLF in a single medical center were reviewed retrospectively. Anatomical recurrence was defined as Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification stage 2 or higher in any compartment. The primary outcome was intergroup analysis for uterine preservation and concomitant hysterectomy patients. The secondary outcomes were anatomical recurrence risk factors and the incidence of adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for demographic differences between groups. Results The anatomical recurrence rate was 19.5%, and the retreatment rate was 11.0% (mean follow-up duration: 22.9 months). Cystocele was the most common recurrent compartment (17.1%). The uterine preservation group (n = 66) was younger, had lower parity, and had fewer stage 3 to 4 cystoceles and uterine prolapses than the concomitant hysterectomy group (n = 16). Shorter operation times (99.4 minutes vs 153.7 minutes, P = .002) and lower anatomical recurrence rates (11.5% vs 45.5%, P = .039) were found in the uterine preservation group before and after PSM. Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery (hazard ratio 3.14) and concomitant hysterectomy (hazard ratio 4.08) were identified as risk factors for anatomical recurrence. The most common adverse event was buttock pain (14.6%), which resolved spontaneously within 4 weeks. Conclusions SSLF is an effective surgical method using native tissue for pelvic reconstruction. Compared with concomitant hysterectomy, SSLF with uterine preservation reduces the anatomical recurrence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approach Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Vaginal Vault Prolapse
    Sahin, Fatih
    Adan, Ramazan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (10)
  • [42] Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and the Technique Used for Uterine Preservation: A Case Report
    Nishii, Shogo
    Ishikawa, Tetsuya
    Okada, Yoshiyuki
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [43] Anatomical Outcome After Sacrospinous Fixation Procedure on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Cases in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Year 2013-2018
    Meutia, Alfa P.
    Triyarintana, Adia
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2020, 36 (05) : 250 - 256
  • [44] Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review
    Vergeldt, Tineke F. M.
    Weemhoff, Mirjam
    IntHout, Joanna
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (11) : 1559 - 1573
  • [45] Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines
    Meriwether, Kate V.
    Antosh, Danielle D.
    Olivera, Cedric K.
    Kim-Fine, Shunaha
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Murphy, Miles
    Grimes, Cara L.
    Sleemi, Ambereen
    Singh, Ruchira
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Crisp, Catrina C.
    Rahn, David D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (02) : 129 - +
  • [46] Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery
    Wallace, Shannon L.
    Kim, Youngwu
    Lai, Erica
    Mehta, Shailja
    Gaigbe-Togbe, Bertille
    Zhang, Chiyuan Amy
    Von Bargen, Emily C.
    Sokol, Eric R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02)
  • [47] Long-Term Outcome of Anterior-Apical Mesh (Surelift) Versus Anterior Colporrhaphy and Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Lo, Tsia-Shu
    Rellora, Louiza Erika
    Rom, Eyal
    Chiung, Huan-Ka
    Yang, Chia-Hsuan
    Lin, Yi-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, : 857 - 866
  • [48] Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic pubocervical fascia reconstruction and sacrospinous ligament fixation with posterior approach for a pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective study of 124 cases
    Zhu, Yunshan
    Zhang, Xiao
    Chen, Danxia
    Li, Guangxiao
    Shang, Shanliang
    Li, Jianqiong
    Yang, Jianhua
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 6 (04): : 154 - 159
  • [49] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: perioperative outcomes
    Gabra, Martina G.
    Winget, Veronica
    Torabi, Mohammad T.
    Addis, Ilana
    Hatch, Kenneth
    Heusinkveld, John
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [50] Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy and Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Techniques Applied Concomitantly in Patients Undergoing Vaginal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Pelvic Prolapse
    Unal, Omer
    Karadeniz, Ozan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (05)